Agency Theory and Corporate Governance in the Brazilian Public Service: A Theoretical Analysis

V. Martins, Jair Jeremias Junior, Luis Fernando Enciso
{"title":"Agency Theory and Corporate Governance in the Brazilian Public Service: A Theoretical Analysis","authors":"V. Martins, Jair Jeremias Junior, Luis Fernando Enciso","doi":"10.37497/corruptionreview.1.2019.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian public service is governed by laws and regulations, which sometimes lead to a divergence of interests between the service provider and the contracting entity. Agency theory states that the delegation of powers to administrators who may not have any equity stake in the organization creates a separation between ownership and control. This situation results in a misalignment of interests between the owners, known as principals, and the hired managers, known as agents. The role of Corporate Governance is to oversee the relationship between management (agents) and owners (principals) and reduce the existing differences, particularly regarding information asymmetry. This paper, through a theoretical essay, aims to present the relationships established in the literature regarding Agency Theory and Corporate Governance in the context of the public sector and services. In this context, a robust Governance structure becomes essential for effective administration and management in public organizations. It is evident that the principles of Corporate Governance, such as Transparency (disclosure), Accountability, and Fairness, align with the principles of Public Administration, particularly in terms of Publicity and Morality.","PeriodicalId":359393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Corruption Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Corruption Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37497/corruptionreview.1.2019.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Brazilian public service is governed by laws and regulations, which sometimes lead to a divergence of interests between the service provider and the contracting entity. Agency theory states that the delegation of powers to administrators who may not have any equity stake in the organization creates a separation between ownership and control. This situation results in a misalignment of interests between the owners, known as principals, and the hired managers, known as agents. The role of Corporate Governance is to oversee the relationship between management (agents) and owners (principals) and reduce the existing differences, particularly regarding information asymmetry. This paper, through a theoretical essay, aims to present the relationships established in the literature regarding Agency Theory and Corporate Governance in the context of the public sector and services. In this context, a robust Governance structure becomes essential for effective administration and management in public organizations. It is evident that the principles of Corporate Governance, such as Transparency (disclosure), Accountability, and Fairness, align with the principles of Public Administration, particularly in terms of Publicity and Morality.
巴西公共服务中的代理理论与公司治理:一个理论分析
巴西的公共服务是由法律和条例管理的,这有时会导致服务提供者和合同实体之间的利益分歧。代理理论指出,将权力委托给可能在组织中没有任何股权的管理者,会造成所有权和控制权之间的分离。这种情况导致所有者(被称为委托人)和被雇佣的经理(被称为代理人)之间的利益不一致。公司治理的作用是监督管理者(代理人)和所有者(委托人)之间的关系,减少现有的差异,特别是在信息不对称方面。本文通过一篇理论文章,旨在展示在公共部门和服务的背景下,关于代理理论和公司治理的文献中建立的关系。在这种情况下,强健的治理结构对于公共组织的有效行政和管理至关重要。很明显,公司治理的原则,如透明(披露)、问责制和公平,与公共行政的原则,特别是在宣传和道德方面是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信