Software Testing Comparison and Selection Strategy

Xiao-yun Zheng, T. Xu, Shao-ju Wang
{"title":"Software Testing Comparison and Selection Strategy","authors":"Xiao-yun Zheng, T. Xu, Shao-ju Wang","doi":"10.1109/IMCCC.2013.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the process of software testing, testing effectiveness problem of random testing and partition testing has always been the focus of the debate, in order to help the tester choose the right testing method depended on specific situation, first of all, measurement method based on P - measure and E - measure are given, and discussion analysis has carried on according to different test allocations, the result of the discussion shows that when the testing cases allocations are proportional to the size of software input domains or proportional to the software sub domains failture rate, the ability of partition testing in finding failure is better than random testing. And then, in view of the software reliability testing, measurement method based on reliability is given. Finally, composite the three measurement methods and reach a decision, the ability of partition testing in finding failure is stronger, but random testing can first find failures with large occurrence probability, and so delivered Reliability tends to be more superior.","PeriodicalId":360796,"journal":{"name":"2013 Third International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Third International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCCC.2013.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the process of software testing, testing effectiveness problem of random testing and partition testing has always been the focus of the debate, in order to help the tester choose the right testing method depended on specific situation, first of all, measurement method based on P - measure and E - measure are given, and discussion analysis has carried on according to different test allocations, the result of the discussion shows that when the testing cases allocations are proportional to the size of software input domains or proportional to the software sub domains failture rate, the ability of partition testing in finding failure is better than random testing. And then, in view of the software reliability testing, measurement method based on reliability is given. Finally, composite the three measurement methods and reach a decision, the ability of partition testing in finding failure is stronger, but random testing can first find failures with large occurrence probability, and so delivered Reliability tends to be more superior.
软件测试比较与选择策略
在软件测试过程中,随机测试和分区测试的测试有效性问题一直是争论的焦点,为了帮助测试人员根据具体情况选择正确的测试方法,首先给出了基于P -测度和E -测度的测试方法,并根据不同的测试分配进行了讨论分析;讨论的结果表明,当测试用例分配与软件输入域的大小成正比或与软件子域的故障率成正比时,分区测试发现故障的能力优于随机测试。然后,针对软件可靠性测试,给出了基于可靠性的测量方法。最后,综合三种测量方法得出结论,分区测试发现故障的能力更强,而随机测试首先发现发生概率较大的故障,因此交付的可靠性往往更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信