Performance Comparison of Three Automated Trading Systems (MACD, PIVOT and SMA) by Means of the d-Backtest PS Implementation

D. Vezeris, C. Schinas
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Three Automated Trading Systems (MACD, PIVOT and SMA) by Means of the d-Backtest PS Implementation","authors":"D. Vezeris, C. Schinas","doi":"10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.4.609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art trading systems are automated and are executed on computers through trading platforms. They generate and execute trades, based on optimized parameters and algorithmic trading strategies. In the current research, such software for automated trading systems was developed, utilizing the following technical indicators, the MACD (oscillator), the SMA (moving average) and the PIVOT points (price crossover).The systems traded on hourly timeframes, using historical data of closing prices over weekly based periods of parameters' optimization and using the dBacktest PS method. Through this research, and the interpretation and evaluation of results, two findings or rather conclusions were drawn. These findings are presented sequentially as follows: In terms of profitability, the adaptive MACD trading system was the most effective one, followed by PIVOT trading system and the SMA was ranked as the least profitable trading system. There is a weak correlation of back testing periods among the above trading systems.","PeriodicalId":381210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.4.609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

State-of-the-art trading systems are automated and are executed on computers through trading platforms. They generate and execute trades, based on optimized parameters and algorithmic trading strategies. In the current research, such software for automated trading systems was developed, utilizing the following technical indicators, the MACD (oscillator), the SMA (moving average) and the PIVOT points (price crossover).The systems traded on hourly timeframes, using historical data of closing prices over weekly based periods of parameters' optimization and using the dBacktest PS method. Through this research, and the interpretation and evaluation of results, two findings or rather conclusions were drawn. These findings are presented sequentially as follows: In terms of profitability, the adaptive MACD trading system was the most effective one, followed by PIVOT trading system and the SMA was ranked as the least profitable trading system. There is a weak correlation of back testing periods among the above trading systems.
通过d-Backtest PS实现的三种自动交易系统(MACD, PIVOT和SMA)的性能比较
最先进的交易系统是自动化的,并通过交易平台在计算机上执行。他们根据优化的参数和算法交易策略生成并执行交易。在目前的研究中,开发了这样的自动交易系统软件,利用以下技术指标,MACD(振荡器),SMA(移动平均线)和PIVOT点(价格交叉)。该系统以小时为时间框架进行交易,使用基于参数优化周期的周收盘价历史数据,并使用dBacktest PS方法。通过这项研究,以及对结果的解释和评价,得出了两个发现或更确切地说是结论。这些发现依次呈现如下:就盈利能力而言,自适应MACD交易系统是最有效的交易系统,其次是PIVOT交易系统,而SMA被评为盈利能力最差的交易系统。上述交易系统之间的回测期存在弱相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信