Binary Codes with Resilience Beyond 1/4 via Interaction

K. Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhijun Zhang
{"title":"Binary Codes with Resilience Beyond 1/4 via Interaction","authors":"K. Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhijun Zhang","doi":"10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the reliable transmission problem, a sender, Alice, wishes to transmit a bit-string x to a remote receiver, Bob, over a binary channel with adversarial noise. The solution to this problem is to encode x using an error correcting code. As it is long known that the distance of binary codes is at most 1/2, reliable transmission is possible only if the channel corrupts (flips) at most a 1/4-fraction of the communicated bits.We revisit the reliable transmission problem in the two-way setting, where both Alice and Bob can send bits to each other. Our main result is the construction of two-way error correcting codes that are resilient to a constant fraction of corruptions strictly larger than 1/4. Moreover, our code has constant rate and requires Bob to only send one short message. We mention that our result resolves an open problem by Haeupler, Kamath, and Velingker [APPROX-RANDOM, 2015] and by Gupta, Kalai, and Zhang [STOC, 2022].Curiously, our new two-way code requires a fresh perspective on classical error correcting codes: While classical codes have only one distance guarantee for all pairs of codewords (i.e., the minimum distance), we construct codes where the distance between a pair of codewords depends on the “compatibility” of the messages they encode. We also prove that such codes are necessary for our result.","PeriodicalId":390222,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the reliable transmission problem, a sender, Alice, wishes to transmit a bit-string x to a remote receiver, Bob, over a binary channel with adversarial noise. The solution to this problem is to encode x using an error correcting code. As it is long known that the distance of binary codes is at most 1/2, reliable transmission is possible only if the channel corrupts (flips) at most a 1/4-fraction of the communicated bits.We revisit the reliable transmission problem in the two-way setting, where both Alice and Bob can send bits to each other. Our main result is the construction of two-way error correcting codes that are resilient to a constant fraction of corruptions strictly larger than 1/4. Moreover, our code has constant rate and requires Bob to only send one short message. We mention that our result resolves an open problem by Haeupler, Kamath, and Velingker [APPROX-RANDOM, 2015] and by Gupta, Kalai, and Zhang [STOC, 2022].Curiously, our new two-way code requires a fresh perspective on classical error correcting codes: While classical codes have only one distance guarantee for all pairs of codewords (i.e., the minimum distance), we construct codes where the distance between a pair of codewords depends on the “compatibility” of the messages they encode. We also prove that such codes are necessary for our result.
通过相互作用,弹性超过1/4的二进制代码
在可靠传输问题中,发送方Alice希望通过具有对抗性噪声的二进制信道将位串x传输给远程接收方Bob。这个问题的解决方案是使用纠错码对x进行编码。众所周知,二进制码的距离最多为1/2,只有当信道损坏(翻转)最多为通信位的1/4分之一时,才有可能实现可靠的传输。我们重新讨论双向设置中的可靠传输问题,即Alice和Bob都可以向对方发送比特。我们的主要成果是双向纠错码的构建,该纠错码对严格大于1/4的恒定比例的损坏具有弹性。此外,我们的代码具有恒定的速率,并且要求Bob只发送一条短消息。我们提到,我们的结果解决了Haeupler, Kamath, and Velingker[大约随机,2015]和Gupta, Kalai, and Zhang [STOC, 2022]提出的一个开放问题。奇怪的是,我们的新双向码需要对经典纠错码有一个新的视角:虽然经典码对所有码字对只有一个距离保证(即最小距离),但我们构建的码中,一对码字之间的距离取决于它们编码的消息的“兼容性”。我们还证明了这些码对于我们的结果是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信