Competence Estimation: Classifying Expertise of Web Discussion Participants

Gaku Morio, K. Fujita
{"title":"Competence Estimation: Classifying Expertise of Web Discussion Participants","authors":"Gaku Morio, K. Fujita","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web discussion bulletin boards have been attracting much attention in recent years. They enable people to hold discussions online, whereas these have traditionally been conducted face-to-face at town meetings, etc. However, in a large-scale bulletin board, not all of the participants have a deep understanding of a topic when engaging in discussion. In particular, it is important to automatically classify a person who is making useful posts if a bulletin board is intended to make agreements. This paper proposes an automated method to identify the expertise of participants by defining expertise as a requisite argumentative competence. In this paper, we propose novel features for competence estimation models: lexical features (IDF, discourse marker, and topic similarity) and a directed influence graph feature. Furthermore, in the evaluation experiments, we evaluate the precision-recall curve against the baseline. As for datasets for evaluation, the expertise of the participants in the data of discussion conducted in the actual Web discussion bulletin board is annotated in seven grades. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methodology is effective in many cases.","PeriodicalId":281712,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Web discussion bulletin boards have been attracting much attention in recent years. They enable people to hold discussions online, whereas these have traditionally been conducted face-to-face at town meetings, etc. However, in a large-scale bulletin board, not all of the participants have a deep understanding of a topic when engaging in discussion. In particular, it is important to automatically classify a person who is making useful posts if a bulletin board is intended to make agreements. This paper proposes an automated method to identify the expertise of participants by defining expertise as a requisite argumentative competence. In this paper, we propose novel features for competence estimation models: lexical features (IDF, discourse marker, and topic similarity) and a directed influence graph feature. Furthermore, in the evaluation experiments, we evaluate the precision-recall curve against the baseline. As for datasets for evaluation, the expertise of the participants in the data of discussion conducted in the actual Web discussion bulletin board is annotated in seven grades. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methodology is effective in many cases.
能力估计:网络讨论参与者的专业知识分类
近年来,网络讨论公告栏吸引了很多关注。它们使人们能够在网上进行讨论,而这些讨论传统上是在城镇会议等面对面进行的。然而,在一个大型的公告板中,并不是所有的参与者在进行讨论时都对一个话题有深刻的理解。特别重要的是,如果一个公告板是用来达成协议的,那么自动对发布有用帖子的人进行分类是很重要的。本文提出了一种自动化的方法,通过将专业知识定义为必要的论证能力来识别参与者的专业知识。在本文中,我们为能力估计模型提出了新的特征:词汇特征(IDF、话语标记和主题相似度)和有向影响图特征。此外,在评估实验中,我们根据基线评估了准确率-召回率曲线。对于评估的数据集,在实际的Web讨论公告板中进行讨论的数据,参与者的专业程度分为七个等级。实验结果表明,该方法在许多情况下是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信