Decreasing of hand colonization and sterility of refill antiseptic in Dr. Yap Eye Hospital, Yogyakarta

Briliana Nur Rohima, Syarah Rysty, Ulupi Rina Hapsari, Palupi Dwi Astuti
{"title":"Decreasing of hand colonization and sterility of refill antiseptic in Dr. Yap Eye Hospital, Yogyakarta","authors":"Briliana Nur Rohima, Syarah Rysty, Ulupi Rina Hapsari, Palupi Dwi Astuti","doi":"10.19106/jmedsci005404202201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Yap Eye Hospital, Yogyakarta uses aseptic gel containing 70% ethyl alcohol to refill antiseptic containers during times of antiseptic scarcity. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and sterility of the refill antiseptics in reducing the number of colonization on the hands of nurses. It was a quasi-experimental using pre- and post-control groups design involving 56 nurses who used antiseptics in a bottle sterilized by plasma device (plasma bottle) compare to those washed using detergent (detergent bottle) before being refilled. Sterility tests were performed every two wk for up to two mo. Colonization pre and post hand hygiene practices were determined as an efficacy test and compared using the Mann-Whitney test in STATA 14. Antiseptic in plasma bottles remains sterile until the week8th since refilled, longer than detergent bottles (6th weeks). The pre-handrub colorizations were 0.04-16.92 CFU/cm2 and decreased significantly post-handrub to 0.00-3.08 CFU/cm2 (p<0.0001). Significant decrease pre- vs post-handrub colonization was observed in usage of detergent bottle (0.04-31.04 vs 0.00-10.48 CFU/cm2, p=0.0007). There was no significant difference in ∆ colonization for two bottles (0.40-15.76 vs 0.04-30.92 CFU/cm2, p=0.8790). In conclusion, antiseptic in the plasma bottle remains sterile longer than in the detergent bottle since refilled. Both of them are equally effective in reducing colonization after handrub activity.","PeriodicalId":173108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19106/jmedsci005404202201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dr. Yap Eye Hospital, Yogyakarta uses aseptic gel containing 70% ethyl alcohol to refill antiseptic containers during times of antiseptic scarcity. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and sterility of the refill antiseptics in reducing the number of colonization on the hands of nurses. It was a quasi-experimental using pre- and post-control groups design involving 56 nurses who used antiseptics in a bottle sterilized by plasma device (plasma bottle) compare to those washed using detergent (detergent bottle) before being refilled. Sterility tests were performed every two wk for up to two mo. Colonization pre and post hand hygiene practices were determined as an efficacy test and compared using the Mann-Whitney test in STATA 14. Antiseptic in plasma bottles remains sterile until the week8th since refilled, longer than detergent bottles (6th weeks). The pre-handrub colorizations were 0.04-16.92 CFU/cm2 and decreased significantly post-handrub to 0.00-3.08 CFU/cm2 (p<0.0001). Significant decrease pre- vs post-handrub colonization was observed in usage of detergent bottle (0.04-31.04 vs 0.00-10.48 CFU/cm2, p=0.0007). There was no significant difference in ∆ colonization for two bottles (0.40-15.76 vs 0.04-30.92 CFU/cm2, p=0.8790). In conclusion, antiseptic in the plasma bottle remains sterile longer than in the detergent bottle since refilled. Both of them are equally effective in reducing colonization after handrub activity.
日惹雅普医生眼科医院手部定植和补充消毒剂不育的减少
日惹雅普医生眼科医院使用含有70%乙醇的无菌凝胶在消毒剂短缺时填充消毒容器。本研究旨在评估补充防腐剂在减少护士手上的定植数量方面的有效性和无菌性。采用前后对照设计的准实验设计,涉及56名护士,用等离子装置灭菌的瓶子(等离子瓶)使用防腐剂,并用洗涤剂(洗涤剂瓶)洗涤,然后再填充。无菌试验每两周进行一次,持续两个月。定殖前后的手部卫生习惯被确定为功效试验,并使用STATA 14中的Mann-Whitney试验进行比较。血浆瓶中的防腐剂在重新灌装后的第8周内保持无菌,比洗涤剂瓶(第6周)更长。洗手前的显色率为0.04 ~ 16.92 CFU/cm2,洗手后显色率为0.00 ~ 3.08 CFU/cm2 (p<0.0001)。洗洁精瓶使用前后细菌定植显著减少(0.04 ~ 31.04 vs 0.00 ~ 10.48 CFU/cm2, p=0.0007)。两瓶的∆定殖量差异无统计学意义(0.40-15.76 vs 0.04-30.92 CFU/cm2, p=0.8790)。总之,血浆瓶中的抗菌剂在重新灌装后保持无菌的时间比洗涤剂瓶中的抗菌剂长。这两种方法在减少洗手活动后的菌落方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信