Coolies, James Yen, and Rebellious Advocacy

B. Hing
{"title":"Coolies, James Yen, and Rebellious Advocacy","authors":"B. Hing","doi":"10.15779/Z38TC6Z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those of us who engage in progressive legal work need to be constantly reminded that we do not know everything - that we are not knights in shining armor swooping in to save subordinated communities. We should be collaborating: working with rather than simply on behalf of clients and allies from whom we have much to learn. Though lawyering for social change is arduous work, there is much to gain in these battles against subordination, not simply from the potential outcome but from the collaborative process itself: as our clients gain strength and confidence, we too are renewed. Thus invigorated by the talent, spirit, and innovation that our clients and allies bring to the table, we aspire to bring that same sense of renewal to those with whom we work. As a legal services attorney, a law school clinical instructor, and a volunteer with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), I am constantly amazed by the talented clients and non-lawyer allies I have encountered. From my contact with such allies I have drawn the invaluable lesson that the fight against discrimination - in essence, the fight against subordination - is one that community lawyers wage most effectively with allies and clients. In their work, these allies demonstrate that the struggle requires skills, techniques, and approaches that, unfortunately, conventional law school classrooms neglect. If we seek to become more effective collaborative lawyers, then we should keep our eyes open for individuals from whom we can learn. Long before I became a lawyer, I met such a person named Y.C. James Yen. Though perhaps little-known among contemporary community lawyers, Yen's work has merited accolades all over the world, as well as broadened and enriched my own perspective of progressive lawyering. Indeed, Yen's approach fits well within the theoretical lawyering framework advanced by Jerry Lopez, Lucie White, and Ascanio Pomelli. These scholars, who are grounded in ongoing community work, have challenged us to re-imagine our roles as community lawyers. They advocate a collaborative approach that respects clients' decision-making capacities, seeks allies in the pursuit of social justice, and is open to learning from clients and community partners. In this article, I first provide some background on Yen and describe his incredible work in Europe, China, and the Philippines. I then revisit the scholarship of Lopez, White, and Piomelli as their theories and experiences pertain to community lawyering in the rebellious or collaborative style, and I relate Yen's historic work to the philosophy and concepts they advance. My hope is thus to remind contemporary rebellious advocates of collaborative possibilities.","PeriodicalId":431450,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TC6Z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those of us who engage in progressive legal work need to be constantly reminded that we do not know everything - that we are not knights in shining armor swooping in to save subordinated communities. We should be collaborating: working with rather than simply on behalf of clients and allies from whom we have much to learn. Though lawyering for social change is arduous work, there is much to gain in these battles against subordination, not simply from the potential outcome but from the collaborative process itself: as our clients gain strength and confidence, we too are renewed. Thus invigorated by the talent, spirit, and innovation that our clients and allies bring to the table, we aspire to bring that same sense of renewal to those with whom we work. As a legal services attorney, a law school clinical instructor, and a volunteer with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), I am constantly amazed by the talented clients and non-lawyer allies I have encountered. From my contact with such allies I have drawn the invaluable lesson that the fight against discrimination - in essence, the fight against subordination - is one that community lawyers wage most effectively with allies and clients. In their work, these allies demonstrate that the struggle requires skills, techniques, and approaches that, unfortunately, conventional law school classrooms neglect. If we seek to become more effective collaborative lawyers, then we should keep our eyes open for individuals from whom we can learn. Long before I became a lawyer, I met such a person named Y.C. James Yen. Though perhaps little-known among contemporary community lawyers, Yen's work has merited accolades all over the world, as well as broadened and enriched my own perspective of progressive lawyering. Indeed, Yen's approach fits well within the theoretical lawyering framework advanced by Jerry Lopez, Lucie White, and Ascanio Pomelli. These scholars, who are grounded in ongoing community work, have challenged us to re-imagine our roles as community lawyers. They advocate a collaborative approach that respects clients' decision-making capacities, seeks allies in the pursuit of social justice, and is open to learning from clients and community partners. In this article, I first provide some background on Yen and describe his incredible work in Europe, China, and the Philippines. I then revisit the scholarship of Lopez, White, and Piomelli as their theories and experiences pertain to community lawyering in the rebellious or collaborative style, and I relate Yen's historic work to the philosophy and concepts they advance. My hope is thus to remind contemporary rebellious advocates of collaborative possibilities.
苦力、甄子丹和叛逆的倡导
我们这些从事进步法律工作的人需要不断被提醒,我们不是无所不知的——我们不是穿着闪亮盔甲的骑士,突然降临拯救从属社区。我们应该合作:与客户和盟友合作,而不仅仅是代表客户和盟友,我们可以从他们身上学到很多东西。虽然为社会变革做律师是一项艰巨的工作,但在这些对抗从属关系的斗争中,我们可以获得很多好处,不仅来自潜在的结果,还来自合作过程本身:当我们的客户获得力量和信心时,我们也得到了更新。因此,我们的客户和合作伙伴为我们带来了人才、精神和创新,我们渴望为我们的合作伙伴带来同样的更新感。作为一名法律服务律师、法学院临床讲师和移民法律资源中心(ILRC)的志愿者,我经常为我遇到的有才华的客户和非律师盟友感到惊讶。从我与这些盟友的接触中,我得到了宝贵的教训:反对歧视的斗争——本质上是反对从属关系的斗争——是社区律师与盟友和客户进行的最有效的斗争。在他们的工作中,这些盟友表明,斗争需要技巧、技巧和方法,不幸的是,传统的法学院课堂忽视了这些。如果我们寻求成为更有效的合作律师,那么我们应该睁大眼睛,寻找可以向我们学习的人。早在我成为律师之前,我就遇到了这样一个人,他的名字叫Y.C. James Yen。虽然在当代社区律师中可能鲜为人知,但甄子丹的作品在世界各地都获得了赞誉,也拓宽和丰富了我自己对进步律师的看法。事实上,甄子丹的方法非常符合杰瑞·洛佩兹、露西·怀特和阿斯卡尼奥·波梅利提出的律师理论框架。这些学者以正在进行的社区工作为基础,挑战我们重新想象我们作为社区律师的角色。他们提倡一种合作的方式,尊重客户的决策能力,在追求社会正义的过程中寻求盟友,并向客户和社区合作伙伴学习。在这篇文章中,我首先提供了一些关于甄子丹的背景,并描述了他在欧洲、中国和菲律宾令人难以置信的工作。然后,我回顾了洛佩兹、怀特和皮奥梅利的学术研究,因为他们的理论和经验与反叛或合作风格的社区律师有关,我把Yen的历史性工作与他们提出的哲学和概念联系起来。因此,我希望提醒当代叛逆的倡导者合作的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信