Assessment of knowledge and practice of gynecology/obstetrics residents and midwives towards essential newborn care At Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

D. Debie, Bethlehem Belay, Melat Tesfaye
{"title":"Assessment of knowledge and practice of gynecology/obstetrics residents and midwives towards essential newborn care At Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia","authors":"D. Debie, Bethlehem Belay, Melat Tesfaye","doi":"10.4314/ejpch.v17i2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A time-bound and chronologically ordered series of medical interventions that a baby receives at birth are referred to as the \"essential newborn protocol.\" This period of immediate care is critical for the babies' subsequent well-being and adaptation. However, there are still reports of health workers lacking good knowledge and practice with newborn care, which was not investigated in our hospital. \nMethods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in TASH with 114 selected gynecology and obstetrics residents and midwives. Using the SPSS version 25 software package, continuous data were described using the mean and standard deviation, while categorical data were de-scribed using frequency and percentage. To identify factors related to knowledge and practice, multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used. \nResult: Eighty-eight residents and 26 midwives were included. Nearly a quarter (24.6%) of participants had good knowledge about essential newborn care. Regarding knowledge level by profession, 31.8% of the residents had good knowledge of essential newborn care, and all the midwives had poor knowledge. The odds of having good knowledge of ENC were 96.3% lower for first-year residents and 90.5% lower for second-year residents as compared to year four. Untrained participants had an 84 percent lower chance of having good knowledge of essential newborn care than trained participants. Regarding practice level by profession, more than two-thirds of 68 (77.3%) residents and 21 (80.8%) midwives had sufficient skill in essential newborn care. \nConclusion: A substantial number of healthcare providers lacked essential newborn care knowledge and practice. The availability of service or on-the-job training, as well as the year of residency, were factors influencing newborn care knowledge. In-service training, encouraging supervision, and provisions should be reinforced to improve newborn care activities.","PeriodicalId":291906,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejpch.v17i2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A time-bound and chronologically ordered series of medical interventions that a baby receives at birth are referred to as the "essential newborn protocol." This period of immediate care is critical for the babies' subsequent well-being and adaptation. However, there are still reports of health workers lacking good knowledge and practice with newborn care, which was not investigated in our hospital. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in TASH with 114 selected gynecology and obstetrics residents and midwives. Using the SPSS version 25 software package, continuous data were described using the mean and standard deviation, while categorical data were de-scribed using frequency and percentage. To identify factors related to knowledge and practice, multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used. Result: Eighty-eight residents and 26 midwives were included. Nearly a quarter (24.6%) of participants had good knowledge about essential newborn care. Regarding knowledge level by profession, 31.8% of the residents had good knowledge of essential newborn care, and all the midwives had poor knowledge. The odds of having good knowledge of ENC were 96.3% lower for first-year residents and 90.5% lower for second-year residents as compared to year four. Untrained participants had an 84 percent lower chance of having good knowledge of essential newborn care than trained participants. Regarding practice level by profession, more than two-thirds of 68 (77.3%) residents and 21 (80.8%) midwives had sufficient skill in essential newborn care. Conclusion: A substantial number of healthcare providers lacked essential newborn care knowledge and practice. The availability of service or on-the-job training, as well as the year of residency, were factors influencing newborn care knowledge. In-service training, encouraging supervision, and provisions should be reinforced to improve newborn care activities.
对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴大学提库尔·安贝萨专科医院妇产科住院医师和助产士在基本新生儿护理方面的知识和实践进行评估
背景:婴儿在出生时接受的一系列有时间限制和按时间顺序排列的医疗干预措施被称为“新生儿基本方案”。这段时间的即时护理对婴儿随后的健康和适应至关重要。然而,仍有报告称卫生工作者缺乏良好的新生儿护理知识和实践,这在我们医院没有进行调查。方法:采用以医院为基础的横断面研究,选取114名妇产科住院医师和助产士。使用SPSS 25版软件包,连续数据用均值和标准差描述,分类数据用频率和百分比描述。为了确定与知识和实践相关的因素,使用了多变量二元逻辑回归分析。结果:纳入住院医师88名,助产士26名。近四分之一(24.6%)的参与者对新生儿基本护理有良好的了解。从专业知识水平来看,31.8%的居民对新生儿基本护理知识有良好的了解,助产士的知识水平均较差。与第四年相比,第一年住院医生对ENC有良好了解的几率低96.3%,第二年住院医生低90.5%。与接受过培训的参与者相比,未经培训的参与者掌握基本新生儿护理知识的机会要低84%。在按专业划分的执业水平方面,68名居民(77.3%)和21名助产士(80.8%)中超过三分之二的人具备足够的基本新生儿护理技能。结论:相当数量的卫生保健提供者缺乏必要的新生儿护理知识和实践。可获得的服务或在职培训,以及住院医师的年份,是影响新生儿护理知识的因素。应加强在职培训,鼓励监督和规定,以改善新生儿护理活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信