Fixation Of Compound Fractures Of Distal Tibia Using A Delta External Fixator As A Definite Modality Of Treatment With Or Without Fibular Plating/ Limited Internal Fixation With K- Wires.

A. Shikari, A. Wani, Kanav Padha, M. Bhatti, H. Dang
{"title":"Fixation Of Compound Fractures Of Distal Tibia Using A Delta External Fixator As A Definite Modality Of Treatment With Or Without Fibular Plating/ Limited Internal Fixation With K- Wires.","authors":"A. Shikari, A. Wani, Kanav Padha, M. Bhatti, H. Dang","doi":"10.5580/e43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : The goal was to evaluate the results of fixation of compound fractures of distal tibia using a delta external fixator and to analyse the results vis-à-vis functional outcome, soft tissue healing and fracture union. Compound fractures of distal tibia produce a challenge to manage, especially when associated with significant soft-tissue injury. Although a variety of options are available to treat these fractures, timing of definitive surgery is crucial with respect to the condition of the soft tissues. Despite the advances that have been made in managing these fractures, new developments in the field continue to lead to better outcomes. Ankle spanning external fixation has become the initial treatment of choice for complex tibial pilon fractures [1].Material: Between 2006 and 2010, 25 patients, three lost in follow up, net 22 (17 men and five women) with compound tibial fractures were treated with delta external fixator using a two staged protocol at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ,government medical college jammu. The average age of the patients was 35.5 years. The fractures, evaluated by the AO classification, included 14 AO43A2, 5 AO43C1, 1 AO43B3, 1 AO43C2,1 AO43C3.There were 5 type I, 9 type II, 6 type IIIa, 2 type IIIb open fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson Classification [2]. In 13 patients the fracture was associated with multiple traumas and in 12 it was a single injury. The injury was due to a high-velocity motor vehicle accident in 18 and a fall in three patients. Method: All the patients were treated by debridement followed by Ankle spanning Delta external fixator, with or without fibular plating/ Kwire fixation of articular elements.All the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for an average follow-up of 7.5 months using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS). RESULTS: The evaluation, based on clinical and radiographic findings and subjective complaints of the patients, was made with the use of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS). 22 patients were followed up, three failed to turn up. AOFAS scoring: excellent in 81% (18/22).Average hospital stay: 28.6 days .Non union: one case, delayed union: two case.Mean time to union 5.5 months (3-16 months). Conclusion: Delta type of external fixator is a safe and useful modality in compound tibial fractures as definitive modality, however caution is advocated as cohort is short.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/e43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction : The goal was to evaluate the results of fixation of compound fractures of distal tibia using a delta external fixator and to analyse the results vis-à-vis functional outcome, soft tissue healing and fracture union. Compound fractures of distal tibia produce a challenge to manage, especially when associated with significant soft-tissue injury. Although a variety of options are available to treat these fractures, timing of definitive surgery is crucial with respect to the condition of the soft tissues. Despite the advances that have been made in managing these fractures, new developments in the field continue to lead to better outcomes. Ankle spanning external fixation has become the initial treatment of choice for complex tibial pilon fractures [1].Material: Between 2006 and 2010, 25 patients, three lost in follow up, net 22 (17 men and five women) with compound tibial fractures were treated with delta external fixator using a two staged protocol at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ,government medical college jammu. The average age of the patients was 35.5 years. The fractures, evaluated by the AO classification, included 14 AO43A2, 5 AO43C1, 1 AO43B3, 1 AO43C2,1 AO43C3.There were 5 type I, 9 type II, 6 type IIIa, 2 type IIIb open fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson Classification [2]. In 13 patients the fracture was associated with multiple traumas and in 12 it was a single injury. The injury was due to a high-velocity motor vehicle accident in 18 and a fall in three patients. Method: All the patients were treated by debridement followed by Ankle spanning Delta external fixator, with or without fibular plating/ Kwire fixation of articular elements.All the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for an average follow-up of 7.5 months using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS). RESULTS: The evaluation, based on clinical and radiographic findings and subjective complaints of the patients, was made with the use of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS). 22 patients were followed up, three failed to turn up. AOFAS scoring: excellent in 81% (18/22).Average hospital stay: 28.6 days .Non union: one case, delayed union: two case.Mean time to union 5.5 months (3-16 months). Conclusion: Delta type of external fixator is a safe and useful modality in compound tibial fractures as definitive modality, however caution is advocated as cohort is short.
应用三角型外固定架固定胫骨远端复合骨折,联合或不联合腓骨钢板/有限的K-丝内固定。
前言:目的是评估使用三角外固定架固定胫骨远端复合骨折的结果,并通过-à-vis功能结局、软组织愈合和骨折愈合分析结果。胫骨远端复合骨折的治疗是一个挑战,特别是当伴有明显的软组织损伤时。尽管治疗这些骨折有多种选择,但最终手术的时机是至关重要的,这与软组织的状况有关。尽管在处理此类裂缝方面已经取得了进展,但该领域的新发展仍在带来更好的结果。跨踝外固定已成为复杂胫骨pilon骨折的首选治疗方法[1]。资料:2006年至2010年间,在查谟政府医学院骨科和创伤学系,25名患者,其中3名在随访中丢失,共计22名(17名男性和5名女性)接受了三角外固定架治疗,采用了分两阶段的方案。患者平均年龄35.5岁。AO43A2型14条,AO43C1型5条,AO43B3型1条,AO43C2型1条,AO43C3型1条。按照gustillo - anderson分类,ⅰ型开放骨折5例,ⅱ型开放骨折9例,IIIa型开放骨折6例,IIIb型开放骨折2例[2]。13例患者骨折伴多发伤,12例为单发伤。受伤是由于18年的高速机动车事故和3名患者的摔倒。方法:所有患者均行清创术后应用跨踝三角外固定架,联合或不联合腓骨钢板/钢丝固定关节构件。采用美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS)对所有患者进行临床和影像学评估,平均随访7.5个月。结果:采用美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS),根据临床和影像学表现以及患者的主观主诉进行评估。22例患者随访,3例未出现。AOFAS评分:优秀占81%(18/22)。平均住院28.6天,不愈合1例,延迟愈合2例。平均愈合时间5.5个月(3-16个月)。结论:德尔塔型外固定架是治疗复合胫骨骨折安全有效的固定方式,但由于患者数量少,需谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信