COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING ON STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION AND MOTIVATION

J. Bermillo, Vic Lycel T. Merto
{"title":"COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING ON STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION AND MOTIVATION","authors":"J. Bermillo, Vic Lycel T. Merto","doi":"10.46827/ejel.v7i1.4148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) is a comprehension approach developed by Janette Klingner and Sharon Vaughn in 1996 and 1998, which uses a mix of whole class instruction and small cooperative peer learning groups. It begins with teacher modeling, role-playing, and teacher think-aloud and then, followed by the formation of heterogeneous cooperative learning groups in which students employ four comprehension strategies: Preview, Click and Clunk, Get the Gist, and Wrap Up. This study investigated the effects of Collaborative Strategic Reading on students’ comprehension and motivation. Specifically, it sought to determine the reading comprehension level of the students in the CSR and non- CSR group in the pretest and posttest; identify the motivation level of the students in the CSR and non- CSR group in the pretest and posttest; find out if there is a significant difference in the reading comprehension level of the students in the CSR and non-CSR groups, and assess if there is a significant difference in the motivation level of the students in the CSR and non-CSR groups. The study used a quasi-experimental design method. It utilized a random sampling among 70 Grade 9 participants. The reading comprehension levels of students were identified through a teacher-made comprehension test which was interpreted using Phil-IRI Silent Reading Program. Students’ motivation was determined through a reading motivation questionnaire adapted from Wigfield and Guthrie (1997). Results showed that the CSR group outscored the non-CSR group on their reading comprehension. Also, students in both groups were moderately motivated towards reading, however, the CSR group has higher motivation compared to non-CSR group. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the reading comprehension of students exposed to CSR and non-CSR groups. On the other hand, the reading motivation of students exposed to CSR and non-CSR groups was statistically significant. Therefore, CSR was effective in improving the reading comprehension of students as well as enhancing their reading motivation.  Article visualizations:","PeriodicalId":226132,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i1.4148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) is a comprehension approach developed by Janette Klingner and Sharon Vaughn in 1996 and 1998, which uses a mix of whole class instruction and small cooperative peer learning groups. It begins with teacher modeling, role-playing, and teacher think-aloud and then, followed by the formation of heterogeneous cooperative learning groups in which students employ four comprehension strategies: Preview, Click and Clunk, Get the Gist, and Wrap Up. This study investigated the effects of Collaborative Strategic Reading on students’ comprehension and motivation. Specifically, it sought to determine the reading comprehension level of the students in the CSR and non- CSR group in the pretest and posttest; identify the motivation level of the students in the CSR and non- CSR group in the pretest and posttest; find out if there is a significant difference in the reading comprehension level of the students in the CSR and non-CSR groups, and assess if there is a significant difference in the motivation level of the students in the CSR and non-CSR groups. The study used a quasi-experimental design method. It utilized a random sampling among 70 Grade 9 participants. The reading comprehension levels of students were identified through a teacher-made comprehension test which was interpreted using Phil-IRI Silent Reading Program. Students’ motivation was determined through a reading motivation questionnaire adapted from Wigfield and Guthrie (1997). Results showed that the CSR group outscored the non-CSR group on their reading comprehension. Also, students in both groups were moderately motivated towards reading, however, the CSR group has higher motivation compared to non-CSR group. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the reading comprehension of students exposed to CSR and non-CSR groups. On the other hand, the reading motivation of students exposed to CSR and non-CSR groups was statistically significant. Therefore, CSR was effective in improving the reading comprehension of students as well as enhancing their reading motivation.  Article visualizations:
合作策略阅读对学生理解和动机的影响
协作策略阅读(CSR)是Janette Klingner和Sharon Vaughn分别于1996年和1998年开发的一种理解方法,它采用了全班教学和小型合作同伴学习小组的结合。首先是教师建模、角色扮演和教师出声思考,然后是形成异构合作学习小组,学生在小组中采用四种理解策略:预览、点击和敲打、获取要点和总结。本研究探讨了协作策略阅读对学生理解和动机的影响。具体而言,它试图确定在前测和后测中,社会责任组和非社会责任组学生的阅读理解水平;在前测和后测中识别企业社会责任组和非企业社会责任组学生的动机水平;考察企业社会责任组和非企业社会责任组学生的阅读理解水平是否存在显著差异,评估企业社会责任组和非企业社会责任组学生的动机水平是否存在显著差异。本研究采用准实验设计方法。本研究采用随机抽样方法对70名九年级学生进行调查。学生的阅读理解水平通过教师制作的阅读理解测试来确定,该测试使用Phil-IRI默读程序进行解释。学生的阅读动机是通过一份改编自Wigfield和Guthrie(1997)的阅读动机问卷来确定的。结果显示,社会责任组在阅读理解上的得分高于非社会责任组。此外,两组学生的阅读动机均为中等,但CSR组的阅读动机高于非CSR组。此外,社会责任组和非社会责任组的学生在阅读理解方面存在显著差异。另一方面,社会责任组和非社会责任组学生的阅读动机有统计学意义。因此,企业社会责任对提高学生的阅读理解能力和增强学生的阅读动机是有效的。可视化条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信