Arbitrabilidade objetiva e administração pública: quais matérias podem ser arbitradas?

Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.54648/rba2021042

Adriana Regina Sarra De Deus

{"title":"Arbitrabilidade objetiva e administração pública: quais matérias podem ser arbitradas?","authors":"Adriana Regina Sarra De Deus","doi":"10.54648/rba2021042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitrations involving Brazilian State Entities still give rise to a fertile field to academic research, so that the present essay intends to examine issues that arise when concretely applying objective arbitrability criteria to assess whether a determined act practiced by a State Entity can or cannot be judged in arbitration. In order to achieve that purpose, the adoption of the dichotomy between acta jure gestionis and acta jure imperii as the criterion to assess objective arbitrability is justified. Based on that, the State prerogatives set forth in art. 104 of Act no. 14.133/2021 are individually examined, as well as their respective provisions in Act no. 13.303/2016, concluding whether each one of them fulfills or not the requirements of objective arbitrability. The analysis encompasses not only legal scholars’ books and essays, but also relevant Brazilian case law on the issue. Finally, the conclusions recall the current status of the Brazilian law on objective arbitrability regarding conflicts involving State Entities and addresses some comments de lege ferenda.\nState Entities; arbitration; objective arbitrability; state prerrogatives; acta jure gestionis; acta jure imperii.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2021042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arbitrations involving Brazilian State Entities still give rise to a fertile field to academic research, so that the present essay intends to examine issues that arise when concretely applying objective arbitrability criteria to assess whether a determined act practiced by a State Entity can or cannot be judged in arbitration. In order to achieve that purpose, the adoption of the dichotomy between acta jure gestionis and acta jure imperii as the criterion to assess objective arbitrability is justified. Based on that, the State prerogatives set forth in art. 104 of Act no. 14.133/2021 are individually examined, as well as their respective provisions in Act no. 13.303/2016, concluding whether each one of them fulfills or not the requirements of objective arbitrability. The analysis encompasses not only legal scholars’ books and essays, but also relevant Brazilian case law on the issue. Finally, the conclusions recall the current status of the Brazilian law on objective arbitrability regarding conflicts involving State Entities and addresses some comments de lege ferenda. State Entities; arbitration; objective arbitrability; state prerrogatives; acta jure gestionis; acta jure imperii.

查看原文本刊更多论文

客观可仲裁性与公共管理:哪些事项可以仲裁?

涉及巴西国家实体的仲裁仍然为学术研究提供了一个肥沃的领域，因此，本文打算研究在具体应用客观可仲裁性标准来评估国家实体所实施的确定行为是否可以在仲裁中得到判决时出现的问题。为了达到这一目的，采用姿势法和帝国法的二分法作为评价客观可仲裁性的标准是合理的。在此基础上，第2条规定的国家特权。第104号法令第14.133/2021号法及其各自的规定分别进行审查。13.303/2016，结论是否每个人都满足客观可仲裁性的要求。该分析不仅包括法律学者的书籍和论文，还包括与该问题相关的巴西判例法。最后，结论回顾了巴西关于涉及国家实体的冲突的客观可仲裁性的法律的现状，并讨论了一些法律上的意见。国家实体;仲裁;客观arbitrability;国家prerrogatives;法学学报;帝国学报。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem

自引率

0.00%

发文量