Endoscopic Capsule Retention: Frequency, Causes and Risk Factors Analysis in 244 Consecutive Procedures

C. Saul, G. Pereira Lima, Abdon Pacurucu Merchan, J. Pereira-Lima
{"title":"Endoscopic Capsule Retention: Frequency, Causes and Risk Factors Analysis in 244 Consecutive Procedures","authors":"C. Saul, G. Pereira Lima, Abdon Pacurucu Merchan, J. Pereira-Lima","doi":"10.52787/agl.v53i2.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Endoscopic capsule is central to the study of the small bowel. Retention is its main complication.\nObjective. To analyze the frequency and risk factors associated with capsule retention. Methods. 244 consecutive examinations were analyzed. The event was defined as “definitive retention” if the capsule remained in the small bowel for 3 weeks after the procedure, and as “temporary retention” if the capsule remained in the small bowel at the end of the procedure but was eliminated spontaneously in the following days. Risk factors associated with retention were inflammatory small bowel strictures, tumours and large diverticula.\nResult. Of 244 procedures, lesions were found in 164 (67.2%), 130 of which were in the small bowel. There were 5 and 2 patients with definitive and temporary retention, respectively. Forty-four cases had risk factors. In 7 (15.9%) there was retention of the endoscopic capsule, with definitive retention in 5 cases. The 2 cases of temporary retention occurred in Meckel's diverticulum and in peptic ulcer scar. The 5 cases of definitive retention occurred in 2 patients with Crohn’s disease, 2 patients with stenosis related with anti-inflammatory drugs use and 1 patient with actinic stenosis. None of the 11 cases of small bowel neoplasia had capsule retention.\nConclusions. There was no endoscopic capsule retention inpatients without risk factors. Definitive retention was observed in approximately one-tenth of all patients with small bowel risk factors. Recognition of risk factors and their identification prior to the procedure is of utmost importance, especially in patients with suspected inflammatory strictures.","PeriodicalId":270053,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52787/agl.v53i2.307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Endoscopic capsule is central to the study of the small bowel. Retention is its main complication. Objective. To analyze the frequency and risk factors associated with capsule retention. Methods. 244 consecutive examinations were analyzed. The event was defined as “definitive retention” if the capsule remained in the small bowel for 3 weeks after the procedure, and as “temporary retention” if the capsule remained in the small bowel at the end of the procedure but was eliminated spontaneously in the following days. Risk factors associated with retention were inflammatory small bowel strictures, tumours and large diverticula. Result. Of 244 procedures, lesions were found in 164 (67.2%), 130 of which were in the small bowel. There were 5 and 2 patients with definitive and temporary retention, respectively. Forty-four cases had risk factors. In 7 (15.9%) there was retention of the endoscopic capsule, with definitive retention in 5 cases. The 2 cases of temporary retention occurred in Meckel's diverticulum and in peptic ulcer scar. The 5 cases of definitive retention occurred in 2 patients with Crohn’s disease, 2 patients with stenosis related with anti-inflammatory drugs use and 1 patient with actinic stenosis. None of the 11 cases of small bowel neoplasia had capsule retention. Conclusions. There was no endoscopic capsule retention inpatients without risk factors. Definitive retention was observed in approximately one-tenth of all patients with small bowel risk factors. Recognition of risk factors and their identification prior to the procedure is of utmost importance, especially in patients with suspected inflammatory strictures.
244例连续内镜手术中胶囊潴留的发生率、原因及危险因素分析
介绍。内镜胶囊是小肠研究的核心。保留是它的主要复杂之处。目的:分析胶囊潴留的发生频率及相关危险因素。方法:对244例连续检查结果进行分析。如果手术后胶囊在小肠中停留3周,则定义为“明确滞留”;如果手术结束时胶囊仍在小肠中,但在接下来的几天内自行消除,则定义为“暂时滞留”。与肠潴留相关的危险因素有炎性小肠狭窄、肿瘤和大憩室。在244例手术中,有164例(67.2%)发现病变,其中130例在小肠。最终滞留5例,暂时滞留2例。44例有危险因素。7例(15.9%)有内窥镜胶囊潴留,5例有明确潴留。暂时性潴留2例发生在梅克尔憩室和消化性溃疡瘢痕。克罗恩病2例,消炎药相关狭窄2例,光化性狭窄1例。11例小肠肿瘤均无包膜潴留。无危险因素的住院患者无内窥镜胶囊潴留。在所有有小肠危险因素的患者中,约有十分之一的患者出现了明确的尿潴留。在手术前识别危险因素及其识别是至关重要的,特别是在怀疑有炎症性狭窄的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信