Productivity-based Features from Article Metadata for Fuzzy Rules to Classify Academic Expert

D. Purwitasari, C. Fatichah, A. G. Sooai, S. Sumpeno, M. Purnomo
{"title":"Productivity-based Features from Article Metadata for Fuzzy Rules to Classify Academic Expert","authors":"D. Purwitasari, C. Fatichah, A. G. Sooai, S. Sumpeno, M. Purnomo","doi":"10.1109/ICAwST.2019.8923316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since modeling expertise is necessary in an expert recommendation system, this paper addressed the issue to obtain researcher expertise in the academic field on certain topic interest. The profile considers productivity and dynamicity of an expert. The productivity of research activities through published articles as research output determine expertise that changes over time to indicate the dynamicity aspect. Here, the resulted expertise status on certain topic interest augments the expert profile. However, the expertise status is unavailable in the expert finder dataset. This paper discussed on approaches to classify the status from features of productivity and dynamicity in the form of fuzzy rules, which can be applied later in the expert recommendation system. Then, the approaches include of determining topics, mapping expertise candidates, extracting features, and labeling expertise status for training to generate fuzzy rules. Because of unavailable expertise status, to get better labels, the results of linear model and clustering were compared. Based on the empirical experiments, rules trained from scaled data with expertise labels from fuzzy clustering gave better results. After simplifying the rules, if-then forms with two features were representable enough for identifying the status of specialist or thriving experts on a topic interest.","PeriodicalId":156538,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAwST.2019.8923316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since modeling expertise is necessary in an expert recommendation system, this paper addressed the issue to obtain researcher expertise in the academic field on certain topic interest. The profile considers productivity and dynamicity of an expert. The productivity of research activities through published articles as research output determine expertise that changes over time to indicate the dynamicity aspect. Here, the resulted expertise status on certain topic interest augments the expert profile. However, the expertise status is unavailable in the expert finder dataset. This paper discussed on approaches to classify the status from features of productivity and dynamicity in the form of fuzzy rules, which can be applied later in the expert recommendation system. Then, the approaches include of determining topics, mapping expertise candidates, extracting features, and labeling expertise status for training to generate fuzzy rules. Because of unavailable expertise status, to get better labels, the results of linear model and clustering were compared. Based on the empirical experiments, rules trained from scaled data with expertise labels from fuzzy clustering gave better results. After simplifying the rules, if-then forms with two features were representable enough for identifying the status of specialist or thriving experts on a topic interest.
基于生产率特征的文章元数据模糊规则学术专家分类
由于专家推荐系统中建模专业知识是必要的,因此本文解决了这一问题,以获得研究人员在某一主题兴趣的学术领域的专业知识。该剖面考虑了专家的生产力和动态性。通过发表文章作为研究产出的研究活动的生产力决定了随时间变化的专业知识,以表明动态方面。在这里,对某个主题感兴趣的结果的专业知识状态增加了专家档案。然而,专家状态在专家查找器数据集中不可用。本文讨论了以模糊规则的形式从生产力特征和动态性特征两方面对状态进行分类的方法,该方法可用于专家推荐系统。然后,确定主题,映射候选专家,提取特征,标记专家状态以进行训练,从而生成模糊规则。由于专家状态不可用,为了得到更好的标签,对线性模型和聚类的结果进行了比较。在经验实验的基础上,用模糊聚类的专家标签对尺度数据进行规则训练得到了更好的结果。在简化了规则之后,具有两个特征的if-then表格足以代表专家或对某个主题感兴趣的蓬勃发展的专家的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信