Biomechanical Properties of Osteophytes and Non-Osteophytic Cortical Bone: A Preliminary Study

F. Xavier, S. Saha
{"title":"Biomechanical Properties of Osteophytes and Non-Osteophytic Cortical Bone: A Preliminary Study","authors":"F. Xavier, S. Saha","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.2016.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several studies have associated the development of spinal osteophytes with disc degeneration. Others have characterized them as adaptive bone remodeling in response to unusual stress/strain. No recent study examined the microstructure and mechanical properties of osteophytes. Materials and methods: Bone tissues were harvested from eight different human cadavers. Beams (length: 24mm, width: 4mm, thickness: 2mm) from lumbar osteophytes, lumbar anterior cortices (non-osteophytic), and femoral diaphyseal cortices were tested for three-point bending and micro-hardness. The specimens were subsequently divided into two parts for material density, ash density, and histological analyses. Results: Hardness values (HV) decreased by 39% from femoral cortical to spinal osteophytic samples. The maximum load to failure for osteophytic and non-osteophytic vertebral beams was 64 and 4 Newtons (N), respectively. Material density ranged from 1.40 to 2.0g/cm3 and 1.18 to 1.70g/cm3 for cortical bone and osteophyte, respectively. Undecalcified histology showed a disorganized structure of the osteophytic osteons as compared with the regular pattern observed in femoral diaphyseal cortical bones. Conclusion: Vertebral osteophytes have higher load carrying capacity than vertebral cortical bone. However, cortical bone presents a more mature and organized microstructure than osteophytes.","PeriodicalId":196856,"journal":{"name":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.2016.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have associated the development of spinal osteophytes with disc degeneration. Others have characterized them as adaptive bone remodeling in response to unusual stress/strain. No recent study examined the microstructure and mechanical properties of osteophytes. Materials and methods: Bone tissues were harvested from eight different human cadavers. Beams (length: 24mm, width: 4mm, thickness: 2mm) from lumbar osteophytes, lumbar anterior cortices (non-osteophytic), and femoral diaphyseal cortices were tested for three-point bending and micro-hardness. The specimens were subsequently divided into two parts for material density, ash density, and histological analyses. Results: Hardness values (HV) decreased by 39% from femoral cortical to spinal osteophytic samples. The maximum load to failure for osteophytic and non-osteophytic vertebral beams was 64 and 4 Newtons (N), respectively. Material density ranged from 1.40 to 2.0g/cm3 and 1.18 to 1.70g/cm3 for cortical bone and osteophyte, respectively. Undecalcified histology showed a disorganized structure of the osteophytic osteons as compared with the regular pattern observed in femoral diaphyseal cortical bones. Conclusion: Vertebral osteophytes have higher load carrying capacity than vertebral cortical bone. However, cortical bone presents a more mature and organized microstructure than osteophytes.
骨赘和非骨赘皮质骨的生物力学特性:初步研究
几项研究已经将脊柱骨赘的发展与椎间盘退变联系起来。其他人将其描述为适应性骨重塑,以应对不寻常的压力/应变。最近没有研究检查骨赘的微观结构和力学性能。材料和方法:从8具不同的人体尸体上采集骨组织。从腰椎骨赘、腰椎前皮质(非骨赘)和股骨骨干皮质提取的梁(长24mm,宽4mm,厚2mm)进行三点弯曲和显微硬度测试。随后将标本分为两部分进行材料密度、灰分密度和组织学分析。结果:股骨皮质与脊柱骨生标本硬度值(HV)下降39%。骨赘和非骨赘脊柱的最大失效载荷分别为64和4牛顿(N)。皮质骨和骨赘的材料密度分别为1.40 ~ 2.0g/cm3和1.18 ~ 1.70g/cm3。与股骨骨干皮质骨的规则结构相比,未钙化组织学显示骨赘骨结构紊乱。结论:椎体骨赘比椎体皮质骨具有更高的承载能力。然而,皮质骨呈现出比骨赘更成熟和有组织的微观结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信