Managing Customer Search via Bundling

Chenguang (Allen) Wu, Chen Jin, Ying‐ju Chen
{"title":"Managing Customer Search via Bundling","authors":"Chenguang (Allen) Wu, Chen Jin, Ying‐ju Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3692871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Product bundling has been a pervasive marketing strategy, and its success has been largely attributed to its strength in reducing customers’ valuation dispersion. Less is known about the efficacy of bundling in settings where customers are less sure about their valuations for a product, especially when that product is newly launched or has an experience nature, and can conduct costly search to learn the product content and discover their true valuations. In this paper, we investigate the interplay between product bundling and customer search and its implications for a monopolist’s optimal pricing strategy. Academic/practical relevance: The existing search theory has focused on decision making that selects the best among multiple alternatives, with costly search being mandatory for the acquisition of each alternative. In this paper, we introduce a framework of multiproduct demands and nonobligatory search, where customers demanding multiple products strategically decide whether to conduct costly search to resolve valuation uncertainty, while reserving the right to purchase these products without having to search them first. Methodology: We apply a nonobligatory search framework to study two different markets: (1) a market of one mature and one new product, in which valuation uncertainty exists for the new product only; and (2) a market of two new products, in which valuation uncertainty exists for both products. The firm fully anticipates the customers’ search behaviors, determines whether to bundle these products or unbundle them, and optimally sets prices. Results: We show that bundling cultivates search in a market of one mature and one new product, but inhibits search in a market of two new products. This contrast emerges as a result of market structures: Bundling reduces the appeal of search by making the search decisions sequential and path-dependent in the latter market, but is less effective in doing so due to the existing heterogeneity in the former market. Our results thus point to an intricate interplay between customer search, market heterogeneity, and prices and their joint impact on the monopolist’s optimal bundling strategy. We also study mixed bundling and show that its economic benefits only carry through when customers’ search cost is not too large. In this case, mixed bundling can lead to considerable revenue improvement in a market of one mature and one new product, but only tiny revenue improvement in a market of two new products. We also study the joint management of product return and product bundling and show that a positive refund should generally be offered for returned products to stimulate customers’ no-search purchase. Managerial implications: Our paper provides guidance for firms selling multiple experience or new products. We propose product bundling to manage customer search, identifying regimes for its economic benefits and clarifying its implication for customer welfare.","PeriodicalId":346985,"journal":{"name":"PROD: Analytical (Service) (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROD: Analytical (Service) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3692871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Problem definition: Product bundling has been a pervasive marketing strategy, and its success has been largely attributed to its strength in reducing customers’ valuation dispersion. Less is known about the efficacy of bundling in settings where customers are less sure about their valuations for a product, especially when that product is newly launched or has an experience nature, and can conduct costly search to learn the product content and discover their true valuations. In this paper, we investigate the interplay between product bundling and customer search and its implications for a monopolist’s optimal pricing strategy. Academic/practical relevance: The existing search theory has focused on decision making that selects the best among multiple alternatives, with costly search being mandatory for the acquisition of each alternative. In this paper, we introduce a framework of multiproduct demands and nonobligatory search, where customers demanding multiple products strategically decide whether to conduct costly search to resolve valuation uncertainty, while reserving the right to purchase these products without having to search them first. Methodology: We apply a nonobligatory search framework to study two different markets: (1) a market of one mature and one new product, in which valuation uncertainty exists for the new product only; and (2) a market of two new products, in which valuation uncertainty exists for both products. The firm fully anticipates the customers’ search behaviors, determines whether to bundle these products or unbundle them, and optimally sets prices. Results: We show that bundling cultivates search in a market of one mature and one new product, but inhibits search in a market of two new products. This contrast emerges as a result of market structures: Bundling reduces the appeal of search by making the search decisions sequential and path-dependent in the latter market, but is less effective in doing so due to the existing heterogeneity in the former market. Our results thus point to an intricate interplay between customer search, market heterogeneity, and prices and their joint impact on the monopolist’s optimal bundling strategy. We also study mixed bundling and show that its economic benefits only carry through when customers’ search cost is not too large. In this case, mixed bundling can lead to considerable revenue improvement in a market of one mature and one new product, but only tiny revenue improvement in a market of two new products. We also study the joint management of product return and product bundling and show that a positive refund should generally be offered for returned products to stimulate customers’ no-search purchase. Managerial implications: Our paper provides guidance for firms selling multiple experience or new products. We propose product bundling to manage customer search, identifying regimes for its economic benefits and clarifying its implication for customer welfare.
通过捆绑管理客户搜索
问题定义:产品捆绑已经成为一种普遍的营销策略,它的成功很大程度上归功于它在减少客户估值分散方面的优势。在消费者不太确定他们对产品的估值的情况下,捆绑销售的效果鲜为人知,尤其是当产品是新推出的或具有体验性质的产品时,他们可能会进行昂贵的搜索以了解产品内容并发现它们的真实估值。本文研究了产品捆绑与顾客搜索之间的相互作用及其对垄断者最优定价策略的影响。学术/实践相关性:现有的搜索理论侧重于在多个备选方案中选择最佳方案的决策制定,每个备选方案的获取都需要进行昂贵的搜索。在本文中,我们引入了一个多产品需求和非强制性搜索的框架,在该框架中,需要多种产品的客户战略性地决定是否进行昂贵的搜索以解决估值不确定性,同时保留购买这些产品的权利,而不必首先搜索它们。方法:我们采用非强制性搜索框架研究两个不同的市场:(1)一个市场有一个成熟产品和一个新产品,其中只存在新产品的估值不确定性;(2)有两种新产品的市场,两种产品都存在估值不确定性。公司充分预测顾客的搜索行为,决定是捆绑这些产品还是不捆绑,并设定最优价格。结果:我们发现,捆绑销售在一个成熟产品和一个新产品的市场上培育了搜索,但在两个新产品的市场上抑制了搜索。这种对比是市场结构的结果:捆绑通过使搜索决策在后一个市场中顺序和路径依赖而降低了搜索的吸引力,但由于前一个市场中存在的异质性,这样做的效果较差。因此,我们的研究结果指出了顾客搜索、市场异质性和价格之间错综复杂的相互作用,以及它们对垄断者最优捆绑策略的共同影响。我们还对混合捆绑进行了研究,表明混合捆绑的经济效益只有在顾客搜索成本不太大的情况下才能实现。在这种情况下,混合捆绑可以在一个成熟产品和一个新产品的市场上带来可观的收入提高,但在两个新产品的市场上只会带来很小的收入提高。我们还研究了产品退货和产品捆绑的联合管理,并表明一般应该对退货产品提供正退款,以刺激客户的无搜索购买。管理启示:本文为销售多种体验或新产品的企业提供了指导。我们建议产品捆绑来管理客户搜索,确定其经济效益制度,并澄清其对客户福利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信