Conservative treatment of patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis

S. Strafun, S. Bohdan, L. Yuriychuk, O. Strafun
{"title":"Conservative treatment of patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis","authors":"S. Strafun, S. Bohdan, L. Yuriychuk, O. Strafun","doi":"10.22141/pjs.12.4.2022.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Secondary adhesive capsulitis, similar to idiopathic one, is accompanied by thickening of the glenohumeral joint capsule and loss of its elasticity. Nonoperative ma­nagement of secondary adhesive capsulitis associated with shoulder soft tissue injuries, impact of prolonged immobilization or surgical treatment still remains controversial. Capsular distension with steroids as in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis is often not used for one reason or another. The purpose: to compare the results of conservative treatment in patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis who underwent or not capsular distension with steroids during the treatment. Materials and methods. From 2015 to 2021 at the Department for Microsurgery and Reconstructive-Recovery Surgery of Upper Limb of the State Institution “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” (Kyiv) and Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital, we have conduc­ted conservative treatment for 825 patients with various soft tissue pathology of the shoulder joint complicated by secondary adhesive capsulitis. All patients were divided into two groups: first one — conservative treatment, second one — conservative treatment with intraarticular injections (capsular distension) with steroids. In our study, we evaluated the function of the shoulder joint using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and after 3 and 6 months. Results. Patients from first group (conservative treatment wi­thout distension intraarti­cular injections) had worse average functional results 3 month after starting treatment according to CSS (p = 0.13) and VAS (p = 0.24) compared to subjects of second group. Six months after the start of treatment, patients from first group had significantly worse results by CSS and VAS than those from group 2, where distension intraarticular injections were performed (p = 0.03 and p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusions. Conservative treatment of patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint should be comprehensive, differentiated and include both non-drug treatment methods and distension intraarticular injections with long-acting steroids.","PeriodicalId":320219,"journal":{"name":"PAIN, JOINTS, SPINE","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN, JOINTS, SPINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/pjs.12.4.2022.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Secondary adhesive capsulitis, similar to idiopathic one, is accompanied by thickening of the glenohumeral joint capsule and loss of its elasticity. Nonoperative ma­nagement of secondary adhesive capsulitis associated with shoulder soft tissue injuries, impact of prolonged immobilization or surgical treatment still remains controversial. Capsular distension with steroids as in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis is often not used for one reason or another. The purpose: to compare the results of conservative treatment in patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis who underwent or not capsular distension with steroids during the treatment. Materials and methods. From 2015 to 2021 at the Department for Microsurgery and Reconstructive-Recovery Surgery of Upper Limb of the State Institution “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” (Kyiv) and Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital, we have conduc­ted conservative treatment for 825 patients with various soft tissue pathology of the shoulder joint complicated by secondary adhesive capsulitis. All patients were divided into two groups: first one — conservative treatment, second one — conservative treatment with intraarticular injections (capsular distension) with steroids. In our study, we evaluated the function of the shoulder joint using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and after 3 and 6 months. Results. Patients from first group (conservative treatment wi­thout distension intraarti­cular injections) had worse average functional results 3 month after starting treatment according to CSS (p = 0.13) and VAS (p = 0.24) compared to subjects of second group. Six months after the start of treatment, patients from first group had significantly worse results by CSS and VAS than those from group 2, where distension intraarticular injections were performed (p = 0.03 and p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusions. Conservative treatment of patients with secondary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint should be comprehensive, differentiated and include both non-drug treatment methods and distension intraarticular injections with long-acting steroids.
继发性粘连性囊炎患者的保守治疗
背景。继发性粘连性囊炎,类似于特发性囊炎,伴肩关节囊增厚和弹性丧失。继发性粘连性囊炎合并肩部软组织损伤、长时间固定或手术治疗的非手术处理仍然存在争议。由于这样或那样的原因,特发性粘连性囊炎通常不使用类固醇进行囊膜扩张。目的:比较继发性粘连性囊炎患者在治疗过程中发生囊膜膨胀或未发生囊膜膨胀的保守治疗结果。材料和方法。2015年至2021年,在“乌克兰国家医学科学院创伤与骨科研究所”(基辅)国立机构上肢显微外科与重建恢复外科和伊万诺-弗兰科夫斯克地区临床医院,我们对825例肩关节各种软组织病理合并继发性粘连性囊炎患者进行了保守治疗。所有患者分为两组:第一组保守治疗,第二组保守治疗关节内注射(囊膜扩张)类固醇。在我们的研究中,我们在治疗前和治疗后3个月和6个月使用恒定肩部评分(CSS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估肩关节功能。结果。根据CSS (p = 0.13)和VAS (p = 0.24),第一组患者(保守治疗,无扩张关节内注射)在开始治疗3个月后的平均功能结果较第二组患者差。治疗6个月后,第1组患者的CSS和VAS评分明显低于第2组(分别为p = 0.03和p = 0.06)。结论。继发性肩关节粘连性囊炎患者的保守治疗应全面、区分,包括非药物治疗方法和长效类固醇关节内扩张注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信