Comparison of Bacterial Colonization and the Biofilm Formation between Indwelling Pure Silicone and Silicone Coated Latex Catheters: A Prospective and Observational Study

Sudish Kumar, A. Bose
{"title":"Comparison of Bacterial Colonization and the Biofilm Formation between Indwelling Pure Silicone and Silicone Coated Latex Catheters: A Prospective and Observational Study","authors":"Sudish Kumar, A. Bose","doi":"10.37506/IJOCS.V8I1.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: 30%-40% of all the hospital acquired infections are due to Catheter Associated Urinary Tract \nInfections (CAUTIs), is directly associated with increase in morbidity, mortality, hospital costs and length \nof the hospital stay. In acute care setting, the prevalence of CAUTIs in the catheterized patient increases \nwith increase in days of catheterization. Bacterial species isolated in CAUTIs show biofilm production, \nwhich provides survival benefit to them by providing protection from environmental stresses and causing \ndecreased susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. This study was designed and conducted to compare bacterial \ncolonization, isolation of bacteria and biofilm production property in patients who were catheterized with \ntwo most common indwelling catheter; pure silicone and silicone coated latex catheters. \nMaterials and Method: This prospective, observational and comparative study was conducted on 200 \npatients of all age and gender who had been catheterized for more than 7 days and had sterile precatheterisation \nurine. Divided into Group A (pure silicone catheter) and B (silicone coated latex catheter) with 100 patients \neach. Urine culture was done on the 8th day of indwelling urinary catheter drainage. If growth was detected, \nthen that bacterium was tested for biofilm production property by tissue culture plate method. Results were \nanalysed with the help of Instat Graph Pad software. \nResults: Bacterial colonization and uropathogens showing Biofilm forming bacteria was more seen in group \nB patients with respect to group A patients and the difference was significant. In both the groups the most \ncommon bacteria were Escherichia coli. \nConclusion: Pure silicone catheter was advantageous over the most commonly used silicone coated latex \ncatheter in terms of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation, although pure silicone catheter didn’t \ncompletely resist the bacterial colonization and the biofilm formation.","PeriodicalId":113416,"journal":{"name":"International journal of contemporary surgery","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of contemporary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/IJOCS.V8I1.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: 30%-40% of all the hospital acquired infections are due to Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs), is directly associated with increase in morbidity, mortality, hospital costs and length of the hospital stay. In acute care setting, the prevalence of CAUTIs in the catheterized patient increases with increase in days of catheterization. Bacterial species isolated in CAUTIs show biofilm production, which provides survival benefit to them by providing protection from environmental stresses and causing decreased susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. This study was designed and conducted to compare bacterial colonization, isolation of bacteria and biofilm production property in patients who were catheterized with two most common indwelling catheter; pure silicone and silicone coated latex catheters. Materials and Method: This prospective, observational and comparative study was conducted on 200 patients of all age and gender who had been catheterized for more than 7 days and had sterile precatheterisation urine. Divided into Group A (pure silicone catheter) and B (silicone coated latex catheter) with 100 patients each. Urine culture was done on the 8th day of indwelling urinary catheter drainage. If growth was detected, then that bacterium was tested for biofilm production property by tissue culture plate method. Results were analysed with the help of Instat Graph Pad software. Results: Bacterial colonization and uropathogens showing Biofilm forming bacteria was more seen in group B patients with respect to group A patients and the difference was significant. In both the groups the most common bacteria were Escherichia coli. Conclusion: Pure silicone catheter was advantageous over the most commonly used silicone coated latex catheter in terms of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation, although pure silicone catheter didn’t completely resist the bacterial colonization and the biofilm formation.
留置纯硅胶导管与涂覆硅胶乳胶导管细菌定植和生物膜形成的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
导读:30%-40%的医院获得性感染是由导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTIs)引起的,它与发病率、死亡率、住院费用和住院时间的增加直接相关。在急性护理环境中,导尿患者的CAUTIs患病率随着导尿天数的增加而增加。在CAUTIs中分离的细菌物种显示出生物膜的生成,这通过提供保护以免受环境压力并降低对抗菌药物的敏感性,为它们提供了生存益处。本研究旨在比较两种最常见留置导管患者的细菌定植、细菌分离和生物膜生成特性;纯硅胶和硅胶涂层乳胶导管。材料与方法:本前瞻性、观察性、对比性研究对200例不同年龄和性别的患者进行了研究,这些患者均已导尿7天以上,且导尿前尿均为无菌。分为A组(纯硅胶导管)和B组(硅胶涂层乳胶导管),各100例。留置导尿管引流第8天进行尿培养。如果检测到生长,则用组织培养板法检测该细菌的生物膜生产性能。使用Instat Graph Pad软件对结果进行分析。结果:B组患者的细菌定植和尿路病原菌表现为生物膜形成菌明显多于A组,差异有统计学意义。在这两组中,最常见的细菌都是大肠杆菌。结论:纯硅胶导管在细菌定植和生物膜形成方面优于最常用的涂硅乳胶导管,尽管纯硅胶导管不能完全抵抗细菌定植和生物膜的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信