Myrtle Beach: A history of shore protection and beach restoration

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2019-09-08 DOI:10.34237/1008732
T. Kana, H. L. Kaczkowski
{"title":"Myrtle Beach: A history of shore protection and beach restoration","authors":"T. Kana, H. L. Kaczkowski","doi":"10.34237/1008732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The City of Myrtle Beach (South Carolina, USA) initiated a three-phase plan for beach restoration in the 1980s: Phase 1 — small-scale beach scraping; Phase 2 — mediumscale nourishment by trucks using inland sand; and Phase 3 — large-scale nourishment by dredge using offshore sand. Phases 1 and 2 were locally funded and served as interim measures (1981-1996) until a 50-year federal project could be constructed (1997 to present). In the course of this work, the city pioneered several approaches to beach management and became a model for the state. These include: the prototype SC beach survey program; the profile volume method for determining shorelines in the presence of seawalls, which was codified in the Beach Management Act (BMA) of 1988; the first locally funded nourishment (1986-1987) and FEMA-funded postdisaster renourishment after Hurricane Hugo 1989-1990; and the first surveys of offshore deposits for nourishment. Before restoration, nearly 65% of the 9-mile (14.5 kilometer) oceanfront was armored with seawalls, bulkheads, and revetments (1981). After nourishment, erosion control structures are now buried and fronted by a vegetated storm berm, while a wider beach accommodates millions of visitors each year. Total volumes and adjusted costs of nourishment from 1986 to early 2018 are 4,997,201 cubic yards (3,820,360 m3) and ~$70.8 million ($2018), respectively. On a unit annual beach length basis, the cost of beach restoration and improvement has averaged $46.80 per one foot of shoreline per year (~$153.50/m/yr) ($2018). Oceanfront property values on a unit length of shoreline basis presently range from ~$15,000/ft (~$49,200/m) for single-family homes to ~$75,000/ft (~$250,000/m) for high-rise buildings, suggesting that beach maintenance has cost well under 0.5% of oceanfront property values per year. Sand loss rates have averaged ~0.8 cy/ft/yr (2.0 m3/m/yr), and the rate of nourishment has been more than adequate to keep up with the ~0.37 ft (0.11 m) sea level rise between 1980 and 2018.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The City of Myrtle Beach (South Carolina, USA) initiated a three-phase plan for beach restoration in the 1980s: Phase 1 — small-scale beach scraping; Phase 2 — mediumscale nourishment by trucks using inland sand; and Phase 3 — large-scale nourishment by dredge using offshore sand. Phases 1 and 2 were locally funded and served as interim measures (1981-1996) until a 50-year federal project could be constructed (1997 to present). In the course of this work, the city pioneered several approaches to beach management and became a model for the state. These include: the prototype SC beach survey program; the profile volume method for determining shorelines in the presence of seawalls, which was codified in the Beach Management Act (BMA) of 1988; the first locally funded nourishment (1986-1987) and FEMA-funded postdisaster renourishment after Hurricane Hugo 1989-1990; and the first surveys of offshore deposits for nourishment. Before restoration, nearly 65% of the 9-mile (14.5 kilometer) oceanfront was armored with seawalls, bulkheads, and revetments (1981). After nourishment, erosion control structures are now buried and fronted by a vegetated storm berm, while a wider beach accommodates millions of visitors each year. Total volumes and adjusted costs of nourishment from 1986 to early 2018 are 4,997,201 cubic yards (3,820,360 m3) and ~$70.8 million ($2018), respectively. On a unit annual beach length basis, the cost of beach restoration and improvement has averaged $46.80 per one foot of shoreline per year (~$153.50/m/yr) ($2018). Oceanfront property values on a unit length of shoreline basis presently range from ~$15,000/ft (~$49,200/m) for single-family homes to ~$75,000/ft (~$250,000/m) for high-rise buildings, suggesting that beach maintenance has cost well under 0.5% of oceanfront property values per year. Sand loss rates have averaged ~0.8 cy/ft/yr (2.0 m3/m/yr), and the rate of nourishment has been more than adequate to keep up with the ~0.37 ft (0.11 m) sea level rise between 1980 and 2018.
默特尔比奇:海岸保护和海滩修复的历史
默特尔比奇市(美国南卡罗来纳州)在20世纪80年代启动了一项三阶段的海滩恢复计划:第一阶段——小规模的海滩清理;第2阶段-用卡车运送中型营养品,利用内陆的沙子;第三阶段-利用近海沙进行大规模疏浚养料。第一阶段和第二阶段由地方资助,并作为临时措施(1981-1996年),直到一个50年的联邦项目建成(1997年至今)。在这项工作的过程中,该市开创了几种海滩管理方法,并成为该州的典范。这些包括:原型SC海滩调查程序;在存在海堤的情况下确定海岸线的剖面体积法,已被编入1988年的《海滩管理法》;1986-1987年第一次由地方资助的营养品和1989-1990年雨果飓风后由联邦应急管理局资助的灾后营养品;第一次对近海沉积物进行营养调查。在修复之前,近65%的9英里(14.5公里)海滨都有海堤、舱壁和护岸(1981年)。在营养之后,侵蚀控制结构现在被掩埋,前面是一个植被繁茂的风暴护堤,而一个更广阔的海滩每年可容纳数百万游客。从1986年到2018年初,营养总量和调整后成本分别为4,997,201立方码(3,820,360立方米)和约7080万美元(2018美元)。以每年的单位海滩长度为基础,海滩修复和改善的成本平均为每年每英尺海岸线46.80美元(约153.50美元/米/年)(2018美元)。目前,海滨物业的单位海岸线价值从单户住宅的约15,000美元/英尺(约49200美元/米)到高层建筑的约75,000美元/英尺(约250,000美元/米)不等,这表明海滩维护成本每年远低于海滨物业价值的0.5%。砂粒流失率平均为0.8 cy/ft/年(2.0 m3/m/年),而营养物的流失率足以跟上1980年至2018年间海平面上升0.37英尺(0.11米)的速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信