Subjective Test Dataset and Meta-data-based Models for 360° Streaming Video Quality

S. Fremerey, Steve Göring, Rakesh Rao Ramachandra Rao, Rachel Huang, A. Raake
{"title":"Subjective Test Dataset and Meta-data-based Models for 360° Streaming Video Quality","authors":"S. Fremerey, Steve Göring, Rakesh Rao Ramachandra Rao, Rachel Huang, A. Raake","doi":"10.1109/MMSP48831.2020.9287065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last years, the number of 360° videos available for streaming has rapidly increased, leading to the need for 360° streaming video quality assessment. In this paper, we report and publish results of three subjective 360° video quality tests, with conditions used to reflect real-world bitrates and resolutions including 4K, 6K and 8K, resulting in 64 stimuli each for the first two tests and 63 for the third. As playout device we used the HTC Vive for the first and HTC Vive Pro for the remaining two tests. Video-quality ratings were collected using the 5-point Absolute Category Rating scale. The 360° dataset provided with the paper contains the links of the used source videos, the raw subjective scores, video-related meta-data, head rotation data and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire results per stimulus and per subject to enable reproducibility of the provided results. Moreover, we use our dataset to compare the performance of state-of-the-art full-reference quality metrics such as VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, ADM2, WS-PSNR and WS-SSIM. Out of all metrics, VMAF was found to show the highest correlation with the subjective scores. Further, we evaluated a center-cropped version of VMAF (\"VMAF-cc\") that showed to provide a similar performance as the full VMAF. In addition to the dataset and the objective metric evaluation, we propose two new video-quality prediction models, a bitstream meta-data-based model and a hybrid no-reference model using bitrate, resolution and pixel information of the video as input. The new lightweight models provide similar performance as the full-reference models while enabling fast calculations.","PeriodicalId":188283,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP48831.2020.9287065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

During the last years, the number of 360° videos available for streaming has rapidly increased, leading to the need for 360° streaming video quality assessment. In this paper, we report and publish results of three subjective 360° video quality tests, with conditions used to reflect real-world bitrates and resolutions including 4K, 6K and 8K, resulting in 64 stimuli each for the first two tests and 63 for the third. As playout device we used the HTC Vive for the first and HTC Vive Pro for the remaining two tests. Video-quality ratings were collected using the 5-point Absolute Category Rating scale. The 360° dataset provided with the paper contains the links of the used source videos, the raw subjective scores, video-related meta-data, head rotation data and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire results per stimulus and per subject to enable reproducibility of the provided results. Moreover, we use our dataset to compare the performance of state-of-the-art full-reference quality metrics such as VMAF, PSNR, SSIM, ADM2, WS-PSNR and WS-SSIM. Out of all metrics, VMAF was found to show the highest correlation with the subjective scores. Further, we evaluated a center-cropped version of VMAF ("VMAF-cc") that showed to provide a similar performance as the full VMAF. In addition to the dataset and the objective metric evaluation, we propose two new video-quality prediction models, a bitstream meta-data-based model and a hybrid no-reference model using bitrate, resolution and pixel information of the video as input. The new lightweight models provide similar performance as the full-reference models while enabling fast calculations.
主观测试数据集和基于元数据的360°流媒体视频质量模型
在过去几年中,可用于流媒体的360°视频数量迅速增加,导致需要对360°流媒体视频质量进行评估。在本文中,我们报告并发布了三个主观360°视频质量测试的结果,这些测试的条件用于反映现实世界的比特率和分辨率,包括4K, 6K和8K,前两次测试各产生64个刺激,第三次测试各产生63个刺激。作为播放设备,我们使用HTC Vive进行了第一次测试,HTC Vive Pro进行了剩下的两次测试。视频质量评级是用5分绝对类别评级量表收集的。本文提供的360°数据集包含使用的源视频链接、原始主观评分、视频相关元数据、头部旋转数据和每个刺激和每个受试者的模拟器疾病问卷结果,以确保所提供结果的可重复性。此外,我们使用我们的数据集来比较最先进的全参考质量指标的性能,如VMAF、PSNR、SSIM、ADM2、WS-PSNR和WS-SSIM。在所有指标中,VMAF与主观得分的相关性最高。此外,我们评估了VMAF的中心裁剪版本(“VMAF-cc”),显示其提供与完整VMAF相似的性能。除了数据集和客观度量评估之外,我们还提出了两种新的视频质量预测模型,即基于比特流元数据的模型和以视频的比特率、分辨率和像素信息为输入的混合无参考模型。新的轻量级模型提供与全参考模型相似的性能,同时实现快速计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信