Embodied in Indigenous Research: How Indigeneity, Positionality, and Relationality Contribute to Research Approaches and Understanding

D. Simon, Nicole Burns, Nikki Hunter-Porter, Tina Lanceleve, Noé Préfontaine, Jaiden Herkimer, Samantha Roan, J. Auger, Anita C. Benoit, Melody E. Morton Ninomiya, Lisa Bourque Bearskin
{"title":"Embodied in Indigenous Research: How Indigeneity, Positionality, and Relationality Contribute to Research Approaches and Understanding","authors":"D. Simon, Nicole Burns, Nikki Hunter-Porter, Tina Lanceleve, Noé Préfontaine, Jaiden Herkimer, Samantha Roan, J. Auger, Anita C. Benoit, Melody E. Morton Ninomiya, Lisa Bourque Bearskin","doi":"10.15273/hpj.v3i1.11475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: As the presence of Indigenous Peoples, world views, perspectives, and teachings continues to grow within academia, the institutional narrative regarding Indigenous approaches to knowing, doing, and being evolves and expands. We would like to contribute to this shifting narrative. Introduction: We are a diverse group of trainees invited into an Indigenous-led research project, entitled IndWisdom, that is exploring the context-mechanism-outcome relationships of Indigenous research. By conducting two parallel study components—an Indigenous-informed realist review and case studies—the larger IndWisdom project aims to advance Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and rights related to how Indigenous Knowledges are centred in research. Through the process of this research, we have come to the understanding that Indigenous Knowledges and Indigenous Knowledge Systems are contextualized and dynamic in nature and are embodied and interconnected in all aspects of one’s lived experience, language, traditions, and culture. Methods: As a collective, the trainees were supported to participate in a sharing circle to introduce ourselves and reflect on how our positionality and understanding of who we are impacts our approach to engaging with research. Results: While we span different nationhoods and time zones, we share how we have fostered virtual spaces that respect each other's perspectives and approaches as well as honour our own Indigenous world views and allied identities. Discussion: In the same way that our realist review involves recording and analyzing context-mechanism-outcome details of other peoples’ studies, our paper provides the context of who we are as co-authors, our mechanisms (approaches) of engaging with each other and the IndWisdom study content, and outcomes from our ways of knowing and doing research.Keywords: Indigenous, research, typology/methodology, lived experience, Indigenous research methodologies, ways of knowing","PeriodicalId":302892,"journal":{"name":"Healthy Populations Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy Populations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/hpj.v3i1.11475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: As the presence of Indigenous Peoples, world views, perspectives, and teachings continues to grow within academia, the institutional narrative regarding Indigenous approaches to knowing, doing, and being evolves and expands. We would like to contribute to this shifting narrative. Introduction: We are a diverse group of trainees invited into an Indigenous-led research project, entitled IndWisdom, that is exploring the context-mechanism-outcome relationships of Indigenous research. By conducting two parallel study components—an Indigenous-informed realist review and case studies—the larger IndWisdom project aims to advance Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and rights related to how Indigenous Knowledges are centred in research. Through the process of this research, we have come to the understanding that Indigenous Knowledges and Indigenous Knowledge Systems are contextualized and dynamic in nature and are embodied and interconnected in all aspects of one’s lived experience, language, traditions, and culture. Methods: As a collective, the trainees were supported to participate in a sharing circle to introduce ourselves and reflect on how our positionality and understanding of who we are impacts our approach to engaging with research. Results: While we span different nationhoods and time zones, we share how we have fostered virtual spaces that respect each other's perspectives and approaches as well as honour our own Indigenous world views and allied identities. Discussion: In the same way that our realist review involves recording and analyzing context-mechanism-outcome details of other peoples’ studies, our paper provides the context of who we are as co-authors, our mechanisms (approaches) of engaging with each other and the IndWisdom study content, and outcomes from our ways of knowing and doing research.Keywords: Indigenous, research, typology/methodology, lived experience, Indigenous research methodologies, ways of knowing
原住民研究的体现:原住民性、位置性与关系如何促成研究方法与理解
目标:随着土著人民的存在、世界观、观点和教义在学术界的不断发展,关于土著认识、行动和存在方法的制度性叙述也在不断发展和扩大。我们愿意为这种转变的叙述做出贡献。简介:我们是一群不同的学员,受邀参加一个名为“IndWisdom”的土著主导的研究项目,该项目正在探索土著研究的背景-机制-结果关系。通过开展两个平行的研究组成部分——土著知情的现实主义审查和案例研究——更大的IndWisdom项目旨在促进土著人民在如何将土著知识集中于研究方面的主权和权利。通过这项研究的过程,我们已经认识到土著知识和土著知识系统在本质上是情境化的和动态的,并且体现在一个人的生活经验、语言、传统和文化的各个方面并相互联系。方法:作为一个集体,支持学员参加一个分享圈,介绍自己,并反思我们的立场和对我们是谁的理解如何影响我们参与研究的方法。结果:虽然我们跨越不同的国家和时区,但我们分享了如何培育虚拟空间,尊重彼此的观点和方法,并尊重我们自己的土著世界观和联盟身份。讨论:就像我们的现实主义回顾涉及记录和分析其他人研究的背景-机制-结果细节一样,我们的论文提供了我们作为共同作者的背景,我们相互参与的机制(方法)和IndWisdom研究内容,以及我们了解和进行研究的方式的结果。关键词:土著,研究,类型学/方法论,生活经验,土著研究方法,认识方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信