Análisis de instrumentos para el diagnóstico de la competencia digital

C. González-Rodríguez, Santos Urbina-Ramírez
{"title":"Análisis de instrumentos para el diagnóstico de la competencia digital","authors":"C. González-Rodríguez, Santos Urbina-Ramírez","doi":"10.6018/riite.411101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of Information and Communication Technologies on society in recent years has caused digital competence to be considered the key to designing educational policies and, consequently, the development of numerous instruments for the evaluation of the digital skills and abilities of teachers, students and the population, in general, in several fields. Therefore, it has been considered relevant to analyze various types of tools used in the past decade in Spain for the diagnosis of the digital competence of students from different educational stages, paying attention, among others, to the items used, the structure of the tools or the methodology. This work goes in depth in the analysis of a series investigations that, despite sharing some methodological aspects in many ways, differ in their vision and conception of the digital competence. This makes the establishment of some common evaluation guidelines more difficult, since it is complicated to agree on how to measure a variable when its own definition could be interpreted in several ways. The definition of a common frame of reference in the educational field that serves to address the evaluation of César González y Santos Urbina RIITE, Núm. 9 (2020), 1-12 ~ 2 ~ digital skills is precisely one of the challenges of researchers and institutions. However, it is not an easy task when digital technologies are characterized by continuous and vertiginous changes.","PeriodicalId":151153,"journal":{"name":"Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.411101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The impact of Information and Communication Technologies on society in recent years has caused digital competence to be considered the key to designing educational policies and, consequently, the development of numerous instruments for the evaluation of the digital skills and abilities of teachers, students and the population, in general, in several fields. Therefore, it has been considered relevant to analyze various types of tools used in the past decade in Spain for the diagnosis of the digital competence of students from different educational stages, paying attention, among others, to the items used, the structure of the tools or the methodology. This work goes in depth in the analysis of a series investigations that, despite sharing some methodological aspects in many ways, differ in their vision and conception of the digital competence. This makes the establishment of some common evaluation guidelines more difficult, since it is complicated to agree on how to measure a variable when its own definition could be interpreted in several ways. The definition of a common frame of reference in the educational field that serves to address the evaluation of César González y Santos Urbina RIITE, Núm. 9 (2020), 1-12 ~ 2 ~ digital skills is precisely one of the challenges of researchers and institutions. However, it is not an easy task when digital technologies are characterized by continuous and vertiginous changes.
数字能力诊断工具分析
近年来,信息和通信技术对社会的影响使数字能力被认为是设计教育政策的关键,因此,开发了许多工具,用于评估教师、学生和一般人群在几个领域的数字技能和能力。因此,分析西班牙过去十年中用于诊断不同教育阶段学生数字能力的各种工具被认为是相关的,其中包括所使用的项目、工具的结构或方法。这项工作深入分析了一系列调查,尽管在许多方面有一些方法方面的共同点,但他们对数字能力的看法和概念不同。这使得建立一些共同的评价准则更加困难,因为当变量本身的定义可以用几种方式解释时,就如何度量变量达成一致意见是很复杂的。确定教育领域的共同参考框架,以处理对csamar González的评价,juan Santos Urbina RIITE, Núm。9(2020), 1-12 ~ 2 ~数字技能恰恰是研究人员和机构面临的挑战之一。然而,当数字技术的特点是持续和令人眩晕的变化时,这并不是一件容易的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信