A Survey on the Verification of Adversarial Data Planes in Software-Defined Networks

Conor Black, Sandra Scott-Hayward
{"title":"A Survey on the Verification of Adversarial Data Planes in Software-Defined Networks","authors":"Conor Black, Sandra Scott-Hayward","doi":"10.1145/3445968.3452092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As network policies are becoming increasingly nuanced and complex, so too are the mechanisms required to ensure that the network is functioning as intended. In particular, since the dawn of software-defined networking and the shift towards high-level descriptions of intended network policy, traditional tools such as ping and traceroute have been insufficient to test that complex data plane configurations have been correctly implemented. As a result, novel data plane verification solutions have been proposed that use formal methods to ensure that network policies are adhered to and that the data plane is free of bugs. While the number of these verification solutions continues to grow, only a few are equipped to verify the data plane when a malicious adversary is present. As research continues to expand the remit of data plane functionality, these solutions may become key to securing an increasingly valuable attack target. In this survey, we review the work that has been dedicated to preventing and detecting attacks on data planes in software-defined networks and discuss some of the unsolved problems in this field that must be addressed in future adversarial verification solutions.","PeriodicalId":339365,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Workshop on Software Defined Networks & Network Function Virtualization Security","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Workshop on Software Defined Networks & Network Function Virtualization Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3445968.3452092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

As network policies are becoming increasingly nuanced and complex, so too are the mechanisms required to ensure that the network is functioning as intended. In particular, since the dawn of software-defined networking and the shift towards high-level descriptions of intended network policy, traditional tools such as ping and traceroute have been insufficient to test that complex data plane configurations have been correctly implemented. As a result, novel data plane verification solutions have been proposed that use formal methods to ensure that network policies are adhered to and that the data plane is free of bugs. While the number of these verification solutions continues to grow, only a few are equipped to verify the data plane when a malicious adversary is present. As research continues to expand the remit of data plane functionality, these solutions may become key to securing an increasingly valuable attack target. In this survey, we review the work that has been dedicated to preventing and detecting attacks on data planes in software-defined networks and discuss some of the unsolved problems in this field that must be addressed in future adversarial verification solutions.
软件定义网络中对抗性数据平面验证研究综述
随着网络策略变得越来越微妙和复杂,确保网络按预期运行所需的机制也变得越来越复杂。特别是,自从软件定义的网络出现并转向对预期网络策略的高级描述以来,ping和traceroute等传统工具已经不足以测试复杂的数据平面配置是否已正确实现。因此,提出了新的数据平面验证解决方案,使用形式化的方法来确保遵守网络策略并确保数据平面没有错误。虽然这些验证解决方案的数量在不断增长,但只有少数能够在恶意攻击者存在时验证数据平面。随着研究继续扩展数据平面功能的范围,这些解决方案可能成为保护越来越有价值的攻击目标的关键。在本调查中,我们回顾了致力于预防和检测软件定义网络中数据平面攻击的工作,并讨论了该领域中一些未解决的问题,这些问题必须在未来的对抗性验证解决方案中加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信