Potentialities and limitations of Planosols with distinct depths of diagnostic horizon

Juciane Maria Santos Sousa Vieira, R. Romero, Raul Shiso Toma, Jaedson Claudio Anunciato Mota, M. Costa
{"title":"Potentialities and limitations of Planosols with distinct depths of diagnostic horizon","authors":"Juciane Maria Santos Sousa Vieira, R. Romero, Raul Shiso Toma, Jaedson Claudio Anunciato Mota, M. Costa","doi":"10.22267/rcia.213802.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a variation in the depth of subsurface horizon of Planosols in semi-arid region, which may influence the agricultural potential and affect food production. The general aim of this study was to identify potentialities and limitations of two Planosols as a function of subsurface horizon depth. The adjacent profiles P1 and P2 were studied in Pentecoste (Ceará, Brazil). Morphological, physical, and chemical analyses were done aiming at soil characterization. Soil bulk density (BD), porosity, and penetration resistance (PR) were analyzed in a completely randomized split-plot design with four replicates to compare P1 and P2 and the horizons Ap and Btf. Btf was found at 62cm depth in P1 and at 18 cm depth in P2. Indicatives of water saturation were more evident in P2. The profile P1 showed lower hardness and higher friability, as well as higher acidity in subsurface (pHH2O from 4.4 to 4.7) and higher aluminum content (1.2cmolc kg-1). Both profiles were eutrophic and showed low contents of organic carbon (1.5 to 8.5g kg-1) and phosphorus (0.9 to 3.9mg kg-1). The sodium percentage in CEC was 9.1% in P1 and 5.5% in P2. Water retention increases in Btf compared with Ap was 7.3% in P2 and 2.7% in P1. Both profiles showed increase in BD in Btf, reaching 1.7g cm-3, while PR was higher in P2 (1.5 MPa). There are potentialities and limitations common to both soil profiles, but P1 has more physical potentialities and more chemical limitations than P2.","PeriodicalId":211714,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.213802.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a variation in the depth of subsurface horizon of Planosols in semi-arid region, which may influence the agricultural potential and affect food production. The general aim of this study was to identify potentialities and limitations of two Planosols as a function of subsurface horizon depth. The adjacent profiles P1 and P2 were studied in Pentecoste (Ceará, Brazil). Morphological, physical, and chemical analyses were done aiming at soil characterization. Soil bulk density (BD), porosity, and penetration resistance (PR) were analyzed in a completely randomized split-plot design with four replicates to compare P1 and P2 and the horizons Ap and Btf. Btf was found at 62cm depth in P1 and at 18 cm depth in P2. Indicatives of water saturation were more evident in P2. The profile P1 showed lower hardness and higher friability, as well as higher acidity in subsurface (pHH2O from 4.4 to 4.7) and higher aluminum content (1.2cmolc kg-1). Both profiles were eutrophic and showed low contents of organic carbon (1.5 to 8.5g kg-1) and phosphorus (0.9 to 3.9mg kg-1). The sodium percentage in CEC was 9.1% in P1 and 5.5% in P2. Water retention increases in Btf compared with Ap was 7.3% in P2 and 2.7% in P1. Both profiles showed increase in BD in Btf, reaching 1.7g cm-3, while PR was higher in P2 (1.5 MPa). There are potentialities and limitations common to both soil profiles, but P1 has more physical potentialities and more chemical limitations than P2.
具有不同诊断层深的Planosols的潜力和局限性
在半干旱区,平流层土壤的地下层深存在变化,这可能影响农业潜力,影响粮食生产。本研究的总体目的是确定两种Planosols作为地下水平深度函数的潜力和局限性。邻近的P1和P2剖面在巴西的Pentecoste (ceear)进行了研究。对土壤进行了形态、物理和化学分析。采用完全随机的4个重复的裂区设计,对土壤容重(BD)、孔隙度(孔隙度)和穿透阻力(PR)进行分析,比较P1和P2以及土层Ap和Btf。Btf出现在P1的62cm深度和P2的18cm深度。P2含水饱和度指标更为明显。P1剖面硬度较低,脆性较高,地下酸性较高(pHH2O为4.4 ~ 4.7),铝含量较高(1.2cmolc kg-1)。两个剖面均为富营养化,有机碳(1.5 ~ 8.5g kg-1)和磷(0.9 ~ 3.9mg kg-1)含量较低。CEC中钠含量P1为9.1%,P2为5.5%。与Ap相比,Btf在P2和P1的保水性分别增加了7.3%和2.7%。两个剖面Btf的BD值均升高,达到1.7g cm-3,而P2的PR值更高,达到1.5 MPa。两种土壤剖面都有共同的潜力和局限性,但P1比P2具有更多的物理潜力和更多的化学局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信