Individual differences and impact of gender on curvature redirection thresholds

Anh Nguyen, Yannick Rothacher, B. Lenggenhager, P. Brugger, A. Kunz
{"title":"Individual differences and impact of gender on curvature redirection thresholds","authors":"Anh Nguyen, Yannick Rothacher, B. Lenggenhager, P. Brugger, A. Kunz","doi":"10.1145/3225153.3225155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To enable real walking in a virtual environment (VE) that is larger than the available physical space, redirection techniques that introduce multisensory conflicts between visual and nonvisual cues to manipulate different aspects of a user's trajectory could be applied. When applied within certain thresholds, these manipulations could go unnoticed and immersion remains intact. Research effort has been spent on identifying these thresholds and a wide range of thresholds was reported in different studies. These differences in thresholds could be explained by many factors such as individual differences, walking speed, or context settings such as environment design, cognitive load, distractors, etc. In this paper, we present a study to investigate the role of gender on curvature redirection thresholds (RDTs) using the maximum likelihood procedure with the classical two-alternative force choice task. Results show high variability in individuals' RDTs, and that on average women have higher curvature RDTs than men. Furthermore, results also confirm existing findings about the negative correlation between walking speed and curvature RDTs.","PeriodicalId":185507,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3225153.3225155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

To enable real walking in a virtual environment (VE) that is larger than the available physical space, redirection techniques that introduce multisensory conflicts between visual and nonvisual cues to manipulate different aspects of a user's trajectory could be applied. When applied within certain thresholds, these manipulations could go unnoticed and immersion remains intact. Research effort has been spent on identifying these thresholds and a wide range of thresholds was reported in different studies. These differences in thresholds could be explained by many factors such as individual differences, walking speed, or context settings such as environment design, cognitive load, distractors, etc. In this paper, we present a study to investigate the role of gender on curvature redirection thresholds (RDTs) using the maximum likelihood procedure with the classical two-alternative force choice task. Results show high variability in individuals' RDTs, and that on average women have higher curvature RDTs than men. Furthermore, results also confirm existing findings about the negative correlation between walking speed and curvature RDTs.
个体差异及性别对曲率重定向阈值的影响
为了在比可用物理空间更大的虚拟环境(VE)中实现真实行走,可以应用重定向技术,在视觉和非视觉线索之间引入多感官冲突,以操纵用户轨迹的不同方面。当在一定的阈值范围内应用时,这些操作可能会被忽视,并且浸入保持完整。研究人员努力确定这些阈值,在不同的研究中报告了各种各样的阈值。这些阈值的差异可以用许多因素来解释,如个体差异、步行速度或环境设置,如环境设计、认知负荷、干扰物等。在本文中,我们提出了一项研究,探讨了性别对曲率重定向阈值(rdt)的作用与经典的双备选力选择任务的最大似然过程。结果显示个体的rdt具有很高的可变性,平均而言,女性的rdt曲率高于男性。此外,研究结果也证实了步行速度与曲率rdt之间的负相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信