The utilization of active methodologies in nursing education: the perception of undergraduate course students

Victoria Marina Lima Dos Santos, I. F. Santos, Cássia Galli Hamamoto, Mara Quaglio Chirelli
{"title":"The utilization of active methodologies in nursing education: the perception of undergraduate course students","authors":"Victoria Marina Lima Dos Santos, I. F. Santos, Cássia Galli Hamamoto, Mara Quaglio Chirelli","doi":"10.33837/msj.v3i2.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to analyze how nursing students of the Marilia Medical School (FAMEMA) perceive the Systematized Educational Unit, to motivate the reflection regarding the course’s curriculum, which goes through a dynamic improvement process, allowing the implementation of necessary changes. It’s about a qualitative study, in which 20 undergraduates from the first and second years were interviewed, providing data for the thematic analysis. The chosen analysis modality made possible to explore the object of investigation in a systematic way and contributed to the beginner’s researcher learning about the qualitative data process. Through the thematic analysis it was observed, in the undergraduates speeches, some contributions of the active methodologies: the learning how to learn, the development of the critical reasoning and the autonomy to search for information in a qualified way, to build the knowledge, teamwork abilities and the humanized education focused on the broader approach of the care. The articulation of the tutorial cases with practice is considered a strength by the interviewed, while the undergraduates’ difficulty in transitioning from the traditional teaching method to the active methodologies after they enroll in FAMEMA is a weakness. According to the students, the study is deeper in the active methods of teaching-learning compared to the traditional teaching. However, there is a need to improve how the contents are delimited and explored.","PeriodicalId":113369,"journal":{"name":"Multi-Science Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multi-Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v3i2.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research is to analyze how nursing students of the Marilia Medical School (FAMEMA) perceive the Systematized Educational Unit, to motivate the reflection regarding the course’s curriculum, which goes through a dynamic improvement process, allowing the implementation of necessary changes. It’s about a qualitative study, in which 20 undergraduates from the first and second years were interviewed, providing data for the thematic analysis. The chosen analysis modality made possible to explore the object of investigation in a systematic way and contributed to the beginner’s researcher learning about the qualitative data process. Through the thematic analysis it was observed, in the undergraduates speeches, some contributions of the active methodologies: the learning how to learn, the development of the critical reasoning and the autonomy to search for information in a qualified way, to build the knowledge, teamwork abilities and the humanized education focused on the broader approach of the care. The articulation of the tutorial cases with practice is considered a strength by the interviewed, while the undergraduates’ difficulty in transitioning from the traditional teaching method to the active methodologies after they enroll in FAMEMA is a weakness. According to the students, the study is deeper in the active methods of teaching-learning compared to the traditional teaching. However, there is a need to improve how the contents are delimited and explored.
积极方法论在护理教育中的运用:本科生的认知
本研究的目的是分析马里亚医学院(FAMEMA)的护理学生如何看待系统化教育单元,以激发对课程课程的反思,这是一个动态的改进过程,允许实施必要的改变。这是一项定性研究,我们采访了20名大一和大二的本科生,为主题分析提供数据。所选择的分析方式可以系统地探索调查对象,并有助于初学者研究人员了解定性数据过程。通过专题分析发现,在大学生演讲中,积极方法论的贡献有:学会如何学习,培养批判性推理能力和自主搜索信息的能力,建立知识和团队合作能力,以及关注更广泛途径的人性化教育。被调查者认为教学案例与实践的衔接是一个优势,而大学生在加入FAMEMA后难以从传统教学方法过渡到主动教学方法是一个劣势。根据学生的反馈,与传统教学相比,在主动教学方法方面的研究更加深入。然而,有必要改进内容的划分和探索方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信