Coût Moyen Pondéré Du Capital Et Performance Sociale De L’Entreprise: Quelle Décote Ou Surcote Adopter Dans Les Modèles De Valorisation? (Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Corporate Social Performance: Which Discount or Premium to Choose in Valuation Models?)

Vincent Lapointe, Jean-Marc Clamy
{"title":"Coût Moyen Pondéré Du Capital Et Performance Sociale De L’Entreprise: Quelle Décote Ou Surcote Adopter Dans Les Modèles De Valorisation? (Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Corporate Social Performance: Which Discount or Premium to Choose in Valuation Models?)","authors":"Vincent Lapointe, Jean-Marc Clamy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2787359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"French Abstract: Cette etude fait une synthese d’une selection de recherches publiees dans le domaine de la responsabilite sociale des entreprises afin de proposer aux praticiens de l’evaluation financiere une decote-surcote du cout moyen pondere du capital (CMPC) en fonction de la performance extra-financiere de l’entreprise. Par exemple, toutes choses egales par ailleurs, il est observe une decote de 107 bps du CMPC pour les entreprises les mieux notees. Nous comparons cette observation, et d’autres, avec les pratiques professionnelles grâce a un sondage aupres de praticiens francais. English Abstract: This study summarizes a selection of published researches on corporate social responsibility in order to propose to financial evaluation practitioners an increase-decrease of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) depending on the extra-financial performance of the firm. For instance, everything else being equal, it has been observed a decrease of 107 bps of the WACC between a firm that is well rated et a firm that is badly rated. We compare this observation, as well as others, with usual professional practices thanks to a survey of French practitioners.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2787359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

French Abstract: Cette etude fait une synthese d’une selection de recherches publiees dans le domaine de la responsabilite sociale des entreprises afin de proposer aux praticiens de l’evaluation financiere une decote-surcote du cout moyen pondere du capital (CMPC) en fonction de la performance extra-financiere de l’entreprise. Par exemple, toutes choses egales par ailleurs, il est observe une decote de 107 bps du CMPC pour les entreprises les mieux notees. Nous comparons cette observation, et d’autres, avec les pratiques professionnelles grâce a un sondage aupres de praticiens francais. English Abstract: This study summarizes a selection of published researches on corporate social responsibility in order to propose to financial evaluation practitioners an increase-decrease of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) depending on the extra-financial performance of the firm. For instance, everything else being equal, it has been observed a decrease of 107 bps of the WACC between a firm that is well rated et a firm that is badly rated. We compare this observation, as well as others, with usual professional practices thanks to a survey of French practitioners.
加权平均资本成本与企业社会绩效:在估值模型中采用哪种折现或加价?(加权平均资本成本和企业社会绩效:在估值模型中选择哪一种贴现或溢价?)
摘要:本研究综合了企业社会责任领域的一些已发表的研究,为财务评估从业人员提供了加权平均资本成本(CMPC)作为企业财务外绩效的函数的折扣率。例如,在其他条件相同的情况下,得分最高的公司的CMPC领口为107 bps。我们通过对法国从业人员的调查,将这一观察结果和其他观察结果与专业实践进行了比较。英文摘要:本研究总结了一些已发表的关于企业社会责任的研究,以便根据公司的财务外业绩,向财务评估从业人员建议增加和减少加权平均资本成本。例如,在其他一切都相等的情况下,观察到一个评级良好的公司和一个评级较差的公司之间的WACC下降了107个基点。由于对法国从业人员进行了调查,我们将这一观察结果与通常的专业做法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信