In Vitro Evaluation of the Medtronic™ Cardioplegia Safety System®

C. Trowbridge, K. R. Woods, M. Muhle, K. Niimi, K. Tremain, Jun Jiang, A. Stammers
{"title":"In Vitro Evaluation of the Medtronic™ Cardioplegia Safety System®","authors":"C. Trowbridge, K. R. Woods, M. Muhle, K. Niimi, K. Tremain, Jun Jiang, A. Stammers","doi":"10.1051/ject/2000322031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myocardial preservation demands the precise and accurate delivery of cardioplegic solutions to provide nutritive delivery and metabolic waste removal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Medtronic® CSS™ Cardioplegia Safety System in an in vitro setting.\nThe CSS™ was evaluated under the following conditions: blood to crystalloid ratios of 1:0, 1:1, 4:1, 8:1, 0:1; potassium concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 mEq L−1; volumetric delivery collection at 100, 250, 500, 750, and 990 mL/min; pressure accuracy at 100 and 300 mmHg; and system safety mechanisms. Measured and predicted values from the CSS were compared using one way ANOVA, with statistical significance accepted at p ≤ 0.05.\nThe measured values for the tested ratios and volume collections were all within the manufacturer’s technical parameters. Potassium concentration results were all within expected values except at 100 mL/min, where the measured value of 17.1 ± 2.1 mmol was lower than the expected 20.0 ± 0.2 mmol (p < .034). As flow rates changed, the CSS line pressure error was constant (0.5 to 3.7%), and the only significant difference was observed at 100 mmHg, 500 mL/min (102.3 ± 1.7 vs. 100.0 ± 0.0 mmHg, P < .003). The device performed accurately and reliably under all simulated safety conditions, including bubble detection, over pressurization and battery backup. In conclusion, the performance of the CSS was within the manufacturer’s specifications for the majority of the tested conditions and operated safely when challenged under varying conditions.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2000322031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myocardial preservation demands the precise and accurate delivery of cardioplegic solutions to provide nutritive delivery and metabolic waste removal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Medtronic® CSS™ Cardioplegia Safety System in an in vitro setting. The CSS™ was evaluated under the following conditions: blood to crystalloid ratios of 1:0, 1:1, 4:1, 8:1, 0:1; potassium concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 mEq L−1; volumetric delivery collection at 100, 250, 500, 750, and 990 mL/min; pressure accuracy at 100 and 300 mmHg; and system safety mechanisms. Measured and predicted values from the CSS were compared using one way ANOVA, with statistical significance accepted at p ≤ 0.05. The measured values for the tested ratios and volume collections were all within the manufacturer’s technical parameters. Potassium concentration results were all within expected values except at 100 mL/min, where the measured value of 17.1 ± 2.1 mmol was lower than the expected 20.0 ± 0.2 mmol (p < .034). As flow rates changed, the CSS line pressure error was constant (0.5 to 3.7%), and the only significant difference was observed at 100 mmHg, 500 mL/min (102.3 ± 1.7 vs. 100.0 ± 0.0 mmHg, P < .003). The device performed accurately and reliably under all simulated safety conditions, including bubble detection, over pressurization and battery backup. In conclusion, the performance of the CSS was within the manufacturer’s specifications for the majority of the tested conditions and operated safely when challenged under varying conditions.
美敦力™心脏骤停安全系统®的体外评估
心肌保存需要精确和准确地提供心脏麻痹解决方案,以提供营养输送和代谢废物清除。本研究的目的是在体外环境中评估美敦力®CSS™心脏骤停安全系统的性能特征。CSS™在以下条件下进行评价:血晶比为1:0、1:1、4:1、8:1、0:1;钾浓度分别为10、20和40 mEq L−1;在100、250、500、750和990 mL/min下进行体积递送收集;压力精度在100和300 mmHg;以及系统安全机制。CSS的实测值和预测值采用单因素方差分析(one - way ANOVA)进行比较,p≤0.05接受统计学显著性。测试比例和体积集合的测量值都在制造商的技术参数范围内。除100 mL/min时(17.1±2.1 mmol)低于20.0±0.2 mmol (p < 0.034)外,钾浓度结果均在预期范围内。随着流量的变化,CSS管路压力误差恒定(0.5 ~ 3.7%),仅在100 mmHg和500 mL/min时存在显著差异(102.3±1.7 vs. 100.0±0.0 mmHg, P < 0.003)。该设备在所有模拟安全条件下都能准确可靠地运行,包括气泡检测、过压和电池备用。总之,在大多数测试条件下,CSS的性能在制造商的规格范围内,并且在不同条件下受到挑战时安全运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信