John Meyendorff’s response to Jugie

N. Russell
{"title":"John Meyendorff’s response to Jugie","authors":"N. Russell","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199644643.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meyendorff was the first to attempt an account of Palamas and Palamite theology based on a thorough investigation of the sources, both edited and unedited. On its publication in 1959, his Introduction was widely acclaimed. Two Western scholars who welcomed it warmly were Eric Mascall and Louis Bouyer, but a reaction set in the 1970s. This chapter follows the debate initiated by the Dominican journal Istina and continued in the pages of St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly and the Eastern Churches Review, and shows how behind it lay the Roman Catholic struggle between conservatives and progressives after the Second Vatican Council. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how Meyendorff abandoned the much-criticized dichotomies of his Introduction but did not alter his fundamental perspective.","PeriodicalId":195211,"journal":{"name":"Gregory Palamas and the Making of Palamism in the Modern Age","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gregory Palamas and the Making of Palamism in the Modern Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199644643.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meyendorff was the first to attempt an account of Palamas and Palamite theology based on a thorough investigation of the sources, both edited and unedited. On its publication in 1959, his Introduction was widely acclaimed. Two Western scholars who welcomed it warmly were Eric Mascall and Louis Bouyer, but a reaction set in the 1970s. This chapter follows the debate initiated by the Dominican journal Istina and continued in the pages of St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly and the Eastern Churches Review, and shows how behind it lay the Roman Catholic struggle between conservatives and progressives after the Second Vatican Council. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how Meyendorff abandoned the much-criticized dichotomies of his Introduction but did not alter his fundamental perspective.
John Meyendorff对Jugie的回应
Meyendorff是第一个尝试对Palamas和Palamite神学进行彻底调查的人,无论是编辑的还是未编辑的。1959年出版后,他的《导论》广受好评。埃里克·马斯卡尔(Eric Mascall)和路易斯·布耶尔(Louis Bouyer)这两位西方学者对此表示热烈欢迎,但他们的反应发生在20世纪70年代。本章跟随由多米尼加杂志Istina发起并在圣弗拉基米尔神学季刊和东方教会评论中继续进行的辩论,并展示其背后是梵蒂冈第二次大公会议后罗马天主教保守派和进步派之间的斗争。本章最后讨论了梅延多夫是如何放弃了他的引言中饱受批评的二分法,但没有改变他的基本观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信