{"title":"District Level Sustainable Livestock Production Index: Tool for Livestock Development Planning in Rajasthan","authors":"P. Chand, S. Sirohi","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.204806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the past two decades, the concept of sustainability has increasingly occupied the centre stage for the development of the agriculture and allied sectors. With the manifestation of stagnating or declining productivity levels, widening regional disparities and the emergence of environmental externalities, the concerns emerged that development process should be sustainable, i.e., it should be environmentally non-degrading, technically appropriate, economically viable and socially acceptable (FAO, 1991). Before targeting the policy interventions to maintain/enhance the sustainability of a crop or livestock production system, it is imperative to examine whether or not certain necessary conditions essential for sustainable development are present in a given region or ecosystem. The major approaches used in the literature to assess the sustainability of a biological production system in a particular region include, estimation of total factor productivity (Ehui and Spencer, 1990; Rosegrant and Evenson, 1995; Kumar and Mittal, 2006), computation of composite indices covering varied dimensions of sustainability (Saleth and Swaminathan, 1992; Yadav and Rai, 2001; Calker et al., 2004; Sen and Hatai, 2007; Singh and Hiremath, 2010) and Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation (RISE) (Hani et al., 2003). While each of these techniques has its own utility, the indexing approach provides a simple practical tool for indicating a set of projects and policies that can be implemented to address the problem areas that impede sustainability. In India, the empirical application of indexing approach has been made in the context of livelihood security, focusing on the ecological and economic dimensions related to crop production. Although in a recent study by Singh and Hiremath (2010), recognising the importance of dairying in economic and nutritional security of rural livelihoods in Gujarat; milk yield and per capita milk availability were taken as indicators in the construction of district level Sustainable Livelihood Security Index (SLSI), but","PeriodicalId":273401,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of agricultural economics","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of agricultural economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.204806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Since the past two decades, the concept of sustainability has increasingly occupied the centre stage for the development of the agriculture and allied sectors. With the manifestation of stagnating or declining productivity levels, widening regional disparities and the emergence of environmental externalities, the concerns emerged that development process should be sustainable, i.e., it should be environmentally non-degrading, technically appropriate, economically viable and socially acceptable (FAO, 1991). Before targeting the policy interventions to maintain/enhance the sustainability of a crop or livestock production system, it is imperative to examine whether or not certain necessary conditions essential for sustainable development are present in a given region or ecosystem. The major approaches used in the literature to assess the sustainability of a biological production system in a particular region include, estimation of total factor productivity (Ehui and Spencer, 1990; Rosegrant and Evenson, 1995; Kumar and Mittal, 2006), computation of composite indices covering varied dimensions of sustainability (Saleth and Swaminathan, 1992; Yadav and Rai, 2001; Calker et al., 2004; Sen and Hatai, 2007; Singh and Hiremath, 2010) and Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation (RISE) (Hani et al., 2003). While each of these techniques has its own utility, the indexing approach provides a simple practical tool for indicating a set of projects and policies that can be implemented to address the problem areas that impede sustainability. In India, the empirical application of indexing approach has been made in the context of livelihood security, focusing on the ecological and economic dimensions related to crop production. Although in a recent study by Singh and Hiremath (2010), recognising the importance of dairying in economic and nutritional security of rural livelihoods in Gujarat; milk yield and per capita milk availability were taken as indicators in the construction of district level Sustainable Livelihood Security Index (SLSI), but
自过去二十年以来,可持续发展的概念日益占据农业和相关部门发展的中心舞台。随着生产力水平的停滞或下降、区域差距的扩大和环境外部性的出现,人们开始关注发展进程应该是可持续的,即它应该在环境上不退化、技术上适当、经济上可行和社会上可以接受(粮农组织,1991年)。在采取政策干预措施以维持/加强作物或牲畜生产系统的可持续性之前,必须审查在某一区域或生态系统中是否存在可持续发展所必需的某些必要条件。文献中用于评估特定区域生物生产系统可持续性的主要方法包括:估计全要素生产率(Ehui和Spencer, 1990;Rosegrant and Evenson, 1995;Kumar和Mittal, 2006),涵盖可持续性不同维度的综合指数的计算(Saleth和Swaminathan, 1992;Yadav and Rai, 2001;Calker et al., 2004;Sen and Hatai, 2007;Singh和Hiremath, 2010)和响应诱导可持续性评估(RISE) (Hani等,2003)。虽然每一种技术都有自己的用途,索引方法提供了一种简单实用的工具,用于指出一套可以执行的项目和政策,以解决妨碍可持续性的问题领域。在印度,指数方法在生计安全的背景下进行了实证应用,重点是与作物生产有关的生态和经济方面。尽管在Singh和Hiremath(2010)最近的一项研究中,认识到乳业对古吉拉特邦农村生计的经济和营养安全的重要性;在构建区级可持续生计安全指数(SLSI)时,以产奶量和人均可得奶量为指标