Effects of pre-cementation cleaning protocols on bond strength of indirect composite resin restorations contaminated with saliva.

Claudia Cañete, Catalina Guerrero, A. Martínez, Elizabeth Gaete
{"title":"Effects of pre-cementation cleaning protocols on bond strength of indirect composite resin restorations contaminated with saliva.","authors":"Claudia Cañete, Catalina Guerrero, A. Martínez, Elizabeth Gaete","doi":"10.22370/ASD.2021.2.2.2878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Compare the effects of different pre-cementing cleaning protocols on adhesive bond strength (MPa) in indirect composite resin restorations contaminated with saliva.  Materials and Methods: 110 tests bodies of indirect composite resin, divided into 2 groups: with no contamination (NC); with contamination (WC); distributed in 22 subgroups (n = 5) according to the Ultrasound (U) variables; Cleaning Paste (CP); Ethanol 96 ° (E), Application times: 5-20-30-180s. Five cylinders (1mm high x 0.7 O) of cement (Variolink Esthetic LC) per sample made on treated and light-cured surfaces (20s). After 24hrs / 37oC + distilled water, they were subjected to the RUA test (0.5 mm / min) until fracture point in a universal test machine. Analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: Contaminated CP30’’ was the protocol with the highest binding resistance (14.57 ± 1.01) (p <0.05).  Conclusion: The gold standard technique - corresponding to ultrasonic washing - is unrecommended for cleaning indirect composite resin restoration, seen as there are other more effective protocols to eliminate surface contaminants. Cleaning paste and Ethanol in times of 20’’ or 30’’ are suggested.","PeriodicalId":357076,"journal":{"name":"Applied Sciences in Dentistry","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Sciences in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22370/ASD.2021.2.2.2878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Compare the effects of different pre-cementing cleaning protocols on adhesive bond strength (MPa) in indirect composite resin restorations contaminated with saliva.  Materials and Methods: 110 tests bodies of indirect composite resin, divided into 2 groups: with no contamination (NC); with contamination (WC); distributed in 22 subgroups (n = 5) according to the Ultrasound (U) variables; Cleaning Paste (CP); Ethanol 96 ° (E), Application times: 5-20-30-180s. Five cylinders (1mm high x 0.7 O) of cement (Variolink Esthetic LC) per sample made on treated and light-cured surfaces (20s). After 24hrs / 37oC + distilled water, they were subjected to the RUA test (0.5 mm / min) until fracture point in a universal test machine. Analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: Contaminated CP30’’ was the protocol with the highest binding resistance (14.57 ± 1.01) (p <0.05).  Conclusion: The gold standard technique - corresponding to ultrasonic washing - is unrecommended for cleaning indirect composite resin restoration, seen as there are other more effective protocols to eliminate surface contaminants. Cleaning paste and Ethanol in times of 20’’ or 30’’ are suggested.
预胶结清洗方法对唾液污染间接复合树脂修复体粘结强度的影响。
目的:比较不同固井清洗方案对唾液污染间接复合树脂修复体黏结强度的影响。材料与方法:间接复合树脂试验体110个,分为2组:无污染(NC);有污染(WC);根据超声(U)变量分布为22个亚组(n = 5);清洁膏(CP);乙醇96°(E),应用时间:5-20-30-180秒。每个样品用五圆柱体(1mm高x 0.7 O)水泥(Variolink aesthetic LC)在处理和光固化表面(20s)上制作。24hrs / 37oC +蒸馏水后,在万能试验机上进行0.5 mm / min的RUA试验,直至断裂点。采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。结果:污染的CP30”是结合阻力最高的方案(14.57±1.01)(p <0.05)。结论:不推荐使用金标准技术(即超声清洗)清洗间接复合树脂修复体,因为存在其他更有效的方法来消除表面污染物。建议使用清洁膏和乙醇,倍率为20 "或30 "。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信