Europe's Crisis Without End: The Consequences of Neoliberalism

T. Palley
{"title":"Europe's Crisis Without End: The Consequences of Neoliberalism","authors":"T. Palley","doi":"10.1093/CPE/BZT004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the eurozone crisis is the product of a toxic neoliberal economic policy cocktail. The mixing of that cocktail traces all the way back to the early 1980s when Europe embraced the neoliberal economic model that undermined the incomeand demand-generation process via wage stagnation and widened income inequality. Stagnation was serially postponed by a number of developments, including the stimulus from German re-unification and the low interest rate convergence produced by creation of the euro. The latter prompted a 10-year credit and asset price bubble that created fictitious prosperity. Postponing stagnation in this fashion has had costs because it worsened the ultimate stagnation by creating large build-ups of debt. Additionally, the creation of the euro ensconced a flawed monetary system that fosters public debt crisis and the political economy of fiscal austerity. Lastly, during this period of postponement, Germany sought to avoid stagnation via export-led growth based on wage repression. That has created an internal balance of payments problem within the eurozone, which is a further impediment to resolving the crisis. There is a way out of the crisis. It requires replacing the neoliberal economic model with a structural Keynesian model; remaking the European Central Bank so that it acts as a government banker; having Germany replace its export-led growth wage suppression model with a domestic demand-led growth model; and creating a pan-European model of wage and fiscal policy coordination that blocks race to the bottom tendencies within Europe. Countries, particularly Germany, can implement some of this agenda on their own. However, much of the agenda must be implemented collectively, which makes change enormously difficult. Moreover, the war of ideas in favor of such reforms has yet to be won. Consequently, both politics and the ruling intellectual climate make success unlikely and augur a troubled future.","PeriodicalId":424775,"journal":{"name":"Neoliberalism and the Road to Inequality and Stagnation","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoliberalism and the Road to Inequality and Stagnation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CPE/BZT004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This paper argues that the eurozone crisis is the product of a toxic neoliberal economic policy cocktail. The mixing of that cocktail traces all the way back to the early 1980s when Europe embraced the neoliberal economic model that undermined the incomeand demand-generation process via wage stagnation and widened income inequality. Stagnation was serially postponed by a number of developments, including the stimulus from German re-unification and the low interest rate convergence produced by creation of the euro. The latter prompted a 10-year credit and asset price bubble that created fictitious prosperity. Postponing stagnation in this fashion has had costs because it worsened the ultimate stagnation by creating large build-ups of debt. Additionally, the creation of the euro ensconced a flawed monetary system that fosters public debt crisis and the political economy of fiscal austerity. Lastly, during this period of postponement, Germany sought to avoid stagnation via export-led growth based on wage repression. That has created an internal balance of payments problem within the eurozone, which is a further impediment to resolving the crisis. There is a way out of the crisis. It requires replacing the neoliberal economic model with a structural Keynesian model; remaking the European Central Bank so that it acts as a government banker; having Germany replace its export-led growth wage suppression model with a domestic demand-led growth model; and creating a pan-European model of wage and fiscal policy coordination that blocks race to the bottom tendencies within Europe. Countries, particularly Germany, can implement some of this agenda on their own. However, much of the agenda must be implemented collectively, which makes change enormously difficult. Moreover, the war of ideas in favor of such reforms has yet to be won. Consequently, both politics and the ruling intellectual climate make success unlikely and augur a troubled future.
欧洲无止境的危机:新自由主义的后果
本文认为,欧元区危机是有毒的新自由主义经济政策鸡尾酒的产物。这种混合可以一直追溯到20世纪80年代初,当时欧洲接受了新自由主义经济模式,这种模式通过工资停滞和收入不平等扩大,破坏了收入和需求产生过程。许多事态的发展,包括德国重新统一带来的刺激,以及创建欧元带来的低利率趋同,接连推迟了经济停滞。后者引发了长达10年的信贷和资产价格泡沫,创造了虚假的繁荣。以这种方式推迟经济停滞是有代价的,因为它造成了巨额债务积累,从而加剧了最终的停滞。此外,欧元的诞生为一个有缺陷的货币体系埋下了隐患,助长了公共债务危机和财政紧缩的政治经济。最后,在这段推迟时期,德国试图通过基于工资抑制的出口导向型增长来避免停滞。这在欧元区内部造成了国际收支问题,进一步阻碍了危机的解决。摆脱危机是有办法的。它需要用结构性凯恩斯主义模式取代新自由主义经济模式;重组欧洲中央银行,使其成为政府的银行;让德国用内需拉动型增长模式取代其出口拉动型增长的工资抑制模式;建立一个泛欧洲的工资和财政政策协调模式,以阻止欧洲内部的逐底竞争趋势。各国,尤其是德国,可以自行实施部分议程。然而,议程的大部分内容必须集体执行,这使得变革极其困难。此外,支持此类改革的思想之战尚未取得胜利。因此,政治和占统治地位的知识分子氛围都使成功不太可能,并预示着一个麻烦的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信