The Archaeology of Passage: Reading Invisibility in Chinese Tombs

W. Hung
{"title":"The Archaeology of Passage: Reading Invisibility in Chinese Tombs","authors":"W. Hung","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198845560.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eleventh section of Daode jing (Tao Te Ching), the foundational text of Taoism, reads: . . . Thirty spokes share a hub; Because [the wheel] is empty, it can be used in a cart. Knead clay to make a vessel. Because it is empty, it can function as a vessel. Carve out doors and windows to make a room. Because they are empty, they make a room usable. Thus we possess things and benefit from them, But it is their emptiness that makes them useful. . . This section has always been appreciated as a supreme piece of rhetoric on the powers of nothingness, a philosophical concept fiercely articulated in the Daode jing. Whereas that may indeed be the author’s intention, the empirical evidence evoked to demonstrate this concept reveals an alternative way of seeing manufactured objects by focusing on their immaterial aspects. This way of looking at things has important implications for archaeological and art historical scholarship on ancient artifacts and architecture precisely because these two disciplines identify themselves with the study of physical remains of the past so firmly that tangibility has become an undisputed condition of academic research in these fields. Archaeologists routinely classify objects from an excavation into categories based on material and then inventory their sizes, shapes, and decoration. Art historians typically start their interpretation of images, objects, and monuments by identifying their formal attributes. Whereas such trained attention to material and formal evidence will surely persist for good reasons, the Daode jing section cautions us of the danger of ignoring the immaterial aspects of man-made forms, which, though eluding conventional typological classification and visual analysis, are nevertheless indispensible to their existence as objects and buildings. The current chapter incorporates this approach into a study of ancient Chinese art and visual culture by arguing that constructed empty spaces on artifacts and structures—holes, vacuums, doors, and windows—possess vital significance to understanding the minds and hands that created them and thus deserve a serious look into their meaning.","PeriodicalId":186392,"journal":{"name":"Conditions of Visibility","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conditions of Visibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845560.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The eleventh section of Daode jing (Tao Te Ching), the foundational text of Taoism, reads: . . . Thirty spokes share a hub; Because [the wheel] is empty, it can be used in a cart. Knead clay to make a vessel. Because it is empty, it can function as a vessel. Carve out doors and windows to make a room. Because they are empty, they make a room usable. Thus we possess things and benefit from them, But it is their emptiness that makes them useful. . . This section has always been appreciated as a supreme piece of rhetoric on the powers of nothingness, a philosophical concept fiercely articulated in the Daode jing. Whereas that may indeed be the author’s intention, the empirical evidence evoked to demonstrate this concept reveals an alternative way of seeing manufactured objects by focusing on their immaterial aspects. This way of looking at things has important implications for archaeological and art historical scholarship on ancient artifacts and architecture precisely because these two disciplines identify themselves with the study of physical remains of the past so firmly that tangibility has become an undisputed condition of academic research in these fields. Archaeologists routinely classify objects from an excavation into categories based on material and then inventory their sizes, shapes, and decoration. Art historians typically start their interpretation of images, objects, and monuments by identifying their formal attributes. Whereas such trained attention to material and formal evidence will surely persist for good reasons, the Daode jing section cautions us of the danger of ignoring the immaterial aspects of man-made forms, which, though eluding conventional typological classification and visual analysis, are nevertheless indispensible to their existence as objects and buildings. The current chapter incorporates this approach into a study of ancient Chinese art and visual culture by arguing that constructed empty spaces on artifacts and structures—holes, vacuums, doors, and windows—possess vital significance to understanding the minds and hands that created them and thus deserve a serious look into their meaning.
通道考古学:解读中国古墓的隐蔽性
道教的基础文本《道德经》第十一节写道:……三十个辐条共用一个轮毂;因为(轮子)是空的,所以可以放在手推车上使用。捏粘土制作器皿。因为它是空的,所以它可以作为一个容器。把门和窗挖出来,做成一个房间。因为它们是空的,所以房间可以使用。因此,我们拥有的东西,并从中受益,但这是他们的空,使他们有用…这一节一直被认为是对虚无力量的最高修辞,这是《道德经》中激烈阐述的一个哲学概念。虽然这可能确实是作者的意图,但为了证明这一概念而唤起的经验证据揭示了通过关注其非物质方面来看待人造物体的另一种方式。这种看待事物的方式对古代文物和建筑的考古学和艺术史研究具有重要的意义,因为这两个学科将自己与研究过去的物理遗迹如此坚定地联系在一起,以至于有形性已经成为这些领域学术研究的一个无可争议的条件。考古学家通常会根据材料对挖掘出来的物品进行分类,然后清点它们的大小、形状和装饰。艺术史学家通常通过确定其形式属性来开始对图像、物体和纪念碑的解释。尽管对材料和形式证据的这种训练有素的关注肯定会有很好的理由持续下去,但道德经部分提醒我们注意忽视人造形式的非物质方面的危险,这些方面虽然逃避了传统的类型学分类和视觉分析,但对于它们作为物体和建筑的存在却是不可或缺的。本章将这一方法纳入对中国古代艺术和视觉文化的研究中,论证了在人工制品和结构上建造的空白空间——洞、真空、门和窗——对于理解创造它们的心灵和双手具有至关重要的意义,因此值得认真研究它们的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信