Uncertainty, responsibility, and reassurance in paediatric palliative care: A conversation analytic study of telephone conversations between parents and clinicians

Holly Sansone, S. Ekberg, S. Danby
{"title":"Uncertainty, responsibility, and reassurance in paediatric palliative care: A conversation analytic study of telephone conversations between parents and clinicians","authors":"Holly Sansone, S. Ekberg, S. Danby","doi":"10.7146/qhc.v1i1.125538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Families play a vital role in the day-to-day medical care of children with life-limiting conditions. Navigating their child’s symptoms, treatments, and the possibility of sudden deteriorations, presents myriad challenges and can be distressing for the family. Paediatric palliative care can provide crucial support for families who are typically responsible for many aspects of their child’s care. Aim: To understand how paediatric palliative care clinicians use reassurance to support families through the uncertainties associated with caring for their children. Methods: One hundred routine telephone conversations between parents and clinicians of a paediatric palliative care service were recorded and analysed using Conversation Analytic methods. Findings: When parents report uncertainty about a specific care task, imply a causal link between this care task and an adverse outcome for their child, and a moral responsibility for the outcome, clinicians respond with reassurance. Clinicians produce reassurance through refuting parents’ accounts and providing an explanation to reframe the potential adverse outcome as independent of parent actions. Parents often agree with the clinicians’ reframings and demonstrate being reassured. Discussion: Specialist paediatric palliative care clinicians routinely foreground support for family members through reassurance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates how family-centred care can be accomplished in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":320293,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Communication","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.v1i1.125538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Families play a vital role in the day-to-day medical care of children with life-limiting conditions. Navigating their child’s symptoms, treatments, and the possibility of sudden deteriorations, presents myriad challenges and can be distressing for the family. Paediatric palliative care can provide crucial support for families who are typically responsible for many aspects of their child’s care. Aim: To understand how paediatric palliative care clinicians use reassurance to support families through the uncertainties associated with caring for their children. Methods: One hundred routine telephone conversations between parents and clinicians of a paediatric palliative care service were recorded and analysed using Conversation Analytic methods. Findings: When parents report uncertainty about a specific care task, imply a causal link between this care task and an adverse outcome for their child, and a moral responsibility for the outcome, clinicians respond with reassurance. Clinicians produce reassurance through refuting parents’ accounts and providing an explanation to reframe the potential adverse outcome as independent of parent actions. Parents often agree with the clinicians’ reframings and demonstrate being reassured. Discussion: Specialist paediatric palliative care clinicians routinely foreground support for family members through reassurance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates how family-centred care can be accomplished in clinical practice.
儿科姑息治疗中的不确定性、责任和保证:父母和临床医生之间电话交谈的谈话分析研究
背景:家庭在生命受限儿童的日常医疗护理中起着至关重要的作用。了解孩子的症状、治疗方法以及突然恶化的可能性,给家庭带来了无数的挑战和痛苦。儿科姑息治疗可以为家庭提供至关重要的支持,这些家庭通常负责其子女的许多方面的护理。目的:了解儿科姑息治疗临床医生如何通过与照顾孩子相关的不确定因素使用安慰来支持家庭。方法:对某儿科姑息治疗中心家长与临床医生的100次常规电话交谈进行记录和分析。研究结果:当父母报告对特定护理任务的不确定性,暗示该护理任务与孩子的不良结果之间存在因果关系,以及对结果的道德责任时,临床医生会做出保证。临床医生通过反驳父母的说法并提供解释来重新定义潜在的不良后果,使其独立于父母的行为,从而产生安慰。父母通常同意临床医生的重新定义,并表现出放心。讨论:专科儿科姑息治疗临床医生通常前景支持家庭成员通过安慰。结论:本研究表明如何以家庭为中心的护理可以在临床实践中完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信