Kenya: Counterterrorism in Kenya: Security aid, impunity and Muslim alienation

Jeremy Prestholdt
{"title":"Kenya: Counterterrorism in Kenya: Security aid, impunity and Muslim alienation","authors":"Jeremy Prestholdt","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9781526105813.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1998 bombing of the US Embassy in Nairobi, the Government of Kenya’s response to terrorism has been multifaceted. Government efforts have primarily relied on civil authorities and the military, thus privileging the use of force over subtler means. The Kenyan Police have employed measures such as profiling, detention, and prosecution. The Kenyan military has conducted operations in Kenya and Somalia. These strategies have contributed to the apprehension of some terrorist suspects and checked Shabaab’s advance in Somalia. Yet, Kenya’s counterterrorism efforts have been hampered by limited coordination among agencies, the use of heavy-handed tactics, and insufficient engagement with civil society organizations. Two defining features of Kenyan counterterrorism efforts have emerged. First, counterterrorism in Kenya has clear sociocultural dimensions. Security forces have responded to the threat of terrorism by focusing intently on Kenya’s alienated Muslim communities both in the Somali-majority north and at the Swahili-speaking coast. As a result, the Government of Kenya’s response to terrorism reflects communal divisions and animosity within Kenyan society that precede contemporary counterterrorism. Second, Kenya’s invasion of neighboring Somalia created and blurred two fronts: one within Kenya and the other in southern Somalia. The actions of Kenyan policy-makers and al Shabaab therefore contributed to a more complete integration of the conflict in Somalia and internal tensions in Kenya..","PeriodicalId":308143,"journal":{"name":"Non-Western responses to terrorism","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-Western responses to terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9781526105813.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the 1998 bombing of the US Embassy in Nairobi, the Government of Kenya’s response to terrorism has been multifaceted. Government efforts have primarily relied on civil authorities and the military, thus privileging the use of force over subtler means. The Kenyan Police have employed measures such as profiling, detention, and prosecution. The Kenyan military has conducted operations in Kenya and Somalia. These strategies have contributed to the apprehension of some terrorist suspects and checked Shabaab’s advance in Somalia. Yet, Kenya’s counterterrorism efforts have been hampered by limited coordination among agencies, the use of heavy-handed tactics, and insufficient engagement with civil society organizations. Two defining features of Kenyan counterterrorism efforts have emerged. First, counterterrorism in Kenya has clear sociocultural dimensions. Security forces have responded to the threat of terrorism by focusing intently on Kenya’s alienated Muslim communities both in the Somali-majority north and at the Swahili-speaking coast. As a result, the Government of Kenya’s response to terrorism reflects communal divisions and animosity within Kenyan society that precede contemporary counterterrorism. Second, Kenya’s invasion of neighboring Somalia created and blurred two fronts: one within Kenya and the other in southern Somalia. The actions of Kenyan policy-makers and al Shabaab therefore contributed to a more complete integration of the conflict in Somalia and internal tensions in Kenya..
肯尼亚:肯尼亚的反恐:安全援助、有罪不罚和穆斯林异化
自1998年美国驻内罗毕大使馆被炸以来,肯尼亚政府对恐怖主义的反应是多方面的。政府的努力主要依靠民政当局和军队,因此优先使用武力而不是更微妙的手段。肯尼亚警方采取了诸如侧写、拘留和起诉等措施。肯尼亚军队在肯尼亚和索马里进行了军事行动。这些战略有助于逮捕一些恐怖主义嫌疑人,并遏制了青年党在索马里的进展。然而,肯尼亚的反恐努力受到各机构之间协调有限、使用高压手段以及与民间社会组织接触不足的阻碍。肯尼亚反恐努力出现了两个决定性特征。首先,肯尼亚的反恐具有明显的社会文化层面。安全部队对恐怖主义威胁的回应是,将注意力集中在索马里人占多数的北部和斯瓦希里语海岸的疏远的穆斯林社区。因此,肯尼亚政府对恐怖主义的反应反映了肯尼亚社会内部在当代反恐怖主义之前就存在的种族分裂和仇恨。其次,肯尼亚对邻国索马里的入侵造成并模糊了两条战线:一条在肯尼亚境内,另一条在索马里南部。因此,肯尼亚决策者和青年党的行动促成了索马里冲突和肯尼亚国内紧张局势的更彻底融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信