"Blurred lines" - Male experiences of work from home policy whilst raising children during COVID-19 (0-11) an interpretative phenomenological analysis

J. Barker
{"title":"\"Blurred lines\" - Male experiences of work from home policy whilst raising children during COVID-19 (0-11) an interpretative phenomenological analysis","authors":"J. Barker","doi":"10.5920/fields.987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The workforce of the UK is under unprecedented strain because of the COVID-19 pandemic where many are forced to work from home. Whilst work from home has been a longstanding part of flexible working arrangements and a key part of the CIPD push for ‘good work’, it was never intended to be the only way that many work. The research suggests that there is a difference between male and female experiences and the existing literature focuses on female experiences of working from home especially when having the additional responsibility of parenthood. The lack of research into the male perspective can be largely attributed to the lack of working from home in this demographic before the pandemic. Therefore, this paper seeks to start and address this fundamental gap in the literature at a time when far more within this demographic are working from home. The objective of the paper is to provide understanding of the lived experiences of this key demographic, fathers, and despite it being under phenomena circumstances, the research aims to begin an important discussion around how work from home affects fathers as well as mothers. We find ourselves in unprecedented times and so the method used was semi-structured, video conference facilitated, interviews which allowed for in-depth qualitative data collection following an interpretative phenomenological approach. Therefore, the method of data analysis was an interpretative phenomenological analysis which, due to the focus on lived experiences, allowed the voice of the participants to remain and for their interpretation of their experience to be the findings of the study. A broad theme, superordinate and subordinate themes were developed through this analysis technique. The central theme of challenging work-life balance was developed as well as 6 superordinate themes and 9 subordinate themes. This paper brings together five fathers experiences of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. It shows that these men found it hard to find balance in a world of blurred lines; this impacted them physically and mentally and put unique strain on their relationships. This study is a base for further research and an ongoing discussion around how the pandemic has changed the way the economy works and therefore begins to plug some key gaps within the existing literature. ","PeriodicalId":239976,"journal":{"name":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The workforce of the UK is under unprecedented strain because of the COVID-19 pandemic where many are forced to work from home. Whilst work from home has been a longstanding part of flexible working arrangements and a key part of the CIPD push for ‘good work’, it was never intended to be the only way that many work. The research suggests that there is a difference between male and female experiences and the existing literature focuses on female experiences of working from home especially when having the additional responsibility of parenthood. The lack of research into the male perspective can be largely attributed to the lack of working from home in this demographic before the pandemic. Therefore, this paper seeks to start and address this fundamental gap in the literature at a time when far more within this demographic are working from home. The objective of the paper is to provide understanding of the lived experiences of this key demographic, fathers, and despite it being under phenomena circumstances, the research aims to begin an important discussion around how work from home affects fathers as well as mothers. We find ourselves in unprecedented times and so the method used was semi-structured, video conference facilitated, interviews which allowed for in-depth qualitative data collection following an interpretative phenomenological approach. Therefore, the method of data analysis was an interpretative phenomenological analysis which, due to the focus on lived experiences, allowed the voice of the participants to remain and for their interpretation of their experience to be the findings of the study. A broad theme, superordinate and subordinate themes were developed through this analysis technique. The central theme of challenging work-life balance was developed as well as 6 superordinate themes and 9 subordinate themes. This paper brings together five fathers experiences of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. It shows that these men found it hard to find balance in a world of blurred lines; this impacted them physically and mentally and put unique strain on their relationships. This study is a base for further research and an ongoing discussion around how the pandemic has changed the way the economy works and therefore begins to plug some key gaps within the existing literature. 
“模糊的界限”——在COVID-19(0-11)期间,男性在家工作政策的经验,同时抚养孩子——解释性现象学分析
由于COVID-19大流行,英国的劳动力面临前所未有的压力,许多人被迫在家工作。虽然长期以来,在家工作一直是灵活工作安排的一部分,也是CIPD推动“好工作”的关键部分,但它从来没有打算成为许多人工作的唯一方式。研究表明,男性和女性的经历是不同的,现有的文献关注的是女性在家工作的经历,尤其是当她们有额外的父母责任时。缺乏对男性视角的研究在很大程度上可归因于这一人口在大流行之前缺乏在家工作。因此,本文试图开始和解决这一基本差距的时候,这一人口统计远远超过在家工作。本文的目的是提供对父亲这一关键人群的生活经历的理解,尽管这是在现象环境下,但研究的目的是围绕在家工作如何影响父亲和母亲展开重要的讨论。我们发现自己处于前所未有的时代,因此使用的方法是半结构化,视频会议便利,访谈,允许根据解释性现象学方法进行深入的定性数据收集。因此,数据分析的方法是一种解释性现象学分析,由于关注生活经验,允许参与者的声音保留下来,并将他们对经验的解释作为研究的结果。通过这一分析方法,形成了广义主题、上级主题和下级主题。提出了挑战工作与生活平衡的中心主题,以及6个上级主题和9个下级主题。本文汇集了五位父亲在COVID-19大流行期间在家工作的经历。它表明,这些人发现很难在一个界限模糊的世界中找到平衡;这对他们的身心都产生了影响,并给他们的关系带来了独特的压力。这项研究为进一步研究和正在进行的讨论奠定了基础,这些讨论围绕疫情如何改变了经济运作方式,从而开始填补现有文献中的一些关键空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信