Exploration and Comparison of Locomotion Mode Recognition Models for Prosthetic Gait

A. Gouda, J. Andrysek
{"title":"Exploration and Comparison of Locomotion Mode Recognition Models for Prosthetic Gait","authors":"A. Gouda, J. Andrysek","doi":"10.1109/cai54212.2023.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing generalizable models for locomotion mode recognition (LMR) of prosthetic gait can be challenging due to limited access of sufficient labelled datasets. Hence, subject-specific models continue to be primarily used. However, there are no studies that investigated the effect of reducing the amount of training data that is presented to the machine learning model during training. Additionally, previously validated LMR models for prosthetic gait primarily used LDA classifiers. However, literature suggests that RF models may improve overall accuracy based on able-body validation. Therefore, to address those gaps, this study compared the performance of LDA and RF models for prosthetic gait and classifiers to LDA. Varied test size ratios data were evaluated to assess the trade-off between performance and amounts of training data.","PeriodicalId":129324,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/cai54212.2023.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing generalizable models for locomotion mode recognition (LMR) of prosthetic gait can be challenging due to limited access of sufficient labelled datasets. Hence, subject-specific models continue to be primarily used. However, there are no studies that investigated the effect of reducing the amount of training data that is presented to the machine learning model during training. Additionally, previously validated LMR models for prosthetic gait primarily used LDA classifiers. However, literature suggests that RF models may improve overall accuracy based on able-body validation. Therefore, to address those gaps, this study compared the performance of LDA and RF models for prosthetic gait and classifiers to LDA. Varied test size ratios data were evaluated to assess the trade-off between performance and amounts of training data.
假肢步态运动模式识别模型的探索与比较
由于缺乏足够的标记数据集,建立可推广的假肢步态运动模式识别(LMR)模型具有挑战性。因此,主要使用的是特定于主题的模型。然而,目前还没有研究调查在训练期间减少呈现给机器学习模型的训练数据量的影响。此外,先前验证的假肢步态LMR模型主要使用LDA分类器。然而,文献表明射频模型可以提高基于健全体验证的整体准确性。因此,为了解决这些差距,本研究比较了LDA和RF模型在假肢步态和LDA分类器方面的性能。评估不同测试大小比例的数据,以评估性能和训练数据量之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信