Anti-slug control experiments using nonlinear observers

E. Jahanshahi, S. Skogestad, E. Grøtli
{"title":"Anti-slug control experiments using nonlinear observers","authors":"E. Jahanshahi, S. Skogestad, E. Grøtli","doi":"10.1109/ACC.2013.6579976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To prevent slug-flow on offshore oil production units, controlling a subsea pressure is the recommended solution. However, the subsea pressure is not often available as a measurement. The top-side pressure is usually measured but it is difficult to use for stabilizing control, because of its Right Half-Plane zero dynamics combined with nonlinearity. We have used the top-side pressure as measurement for different observers to estimate state variables of the system, and then used the estimated states for control. This scheme was tested in experiments using three types of observers. A simple Luenberger observer with a large gain was found to be more robust than the standard Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). We modified the UKF to a Fast UKF for time-scale separation of the closed-loop system. The resulting observer was robust, also less sensitive to measurement noise compared to the simple Luenberger observer when measuring the top-side pressure. Surprisingly, the nonlinear observers were not able to work in closed-loop when the subsea pressure was used as the measurement. On the other hand, a linear observer worked very well for this case with a larger operating range compared to that of the top-side pressure.","PeriodicalId":145065,"journal":{"name":"2013 American Control Conference","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6579976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

To prevent slug-flow on offshore oil production units, controlling a subsea pressure is the recommended solution. However, the subsea pressure is not often available as a measurement. The top-side pressure is usually measured but it is difficult to use for stabilizing control, because of its Right Half-Plane zero dynamics combined with nonlinearity. We have used the top-side pressure as measurement for different observers to estimate state variables of the system, and then used the estimated states for control. This scheme was tested in experiments using three types of observers. A simple Luenberger observer with a large gain was found to be more robust than the standard Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). We modified the UKF to a Fast UKF for time-scale separation of the closed-loop system. The resulting observer was robust, also less sensitive to measurement noise compared to the simple Luenberger observer when measuring the top-side pressure. Surprisingly, the nonlinear observers were not able to work in closed-loop when the subsea pressure was used as the measurement. On the other hand, a linear observer worked very well for this case with a larger operating range compared to that of the top-side pressure.
非线性观测器抗弹塞控制实验
为了防止海上石油生产装置的段塞流,建议控制海底压力。然而,海底压力通常无法作为测量手段。顶侧压力通常是测量的,但由于其右半平面零动力学与非线性相结合,难以用于稳定控制。我们使用顶侧压力作为不同观测器的测量值来估计系统的状态变量,然后使用估计的状态进行控制。该方案在实验中使用三种类型的观察者进行了测试。发现具有大增益的简单Luenberger观测器比标准Unscented卡尔曼滤波器(UKF)具有更强的鲁棒性。为了实现闭环系统的时标分离,我们将UKF改进为Fast UKF。由此产生的观测器具有鲁棒性,在测量顶部压力时,与简单的Luenberger观测器相比,对测量噪声的敏感度也较低。令人惊讶的是,当使用海底压力作为测量时,非线性观测器无法在闭环中工作。另一方面,与顶侧压力相比,线性观测器的工作范围更大,在这种情况下工作得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信