Corporate Sustainable Practices and Profitability – Compatible?

M. Das
{"title":"Corporate Sustainable Practices and Profitability – Compatible?","authors":"M. Das","doi":"10.30560/jems.v5n2p13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon risks and corporate social responsibility have emerged as top priorities in the global climate change agenda, leading shareholders to exert greater pressure on corporations to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and policymakers to consider regulatory actions on carbon disclosures. Proponents stress that ESG strategies will improve financial performance, while detractors focus on their large upfront costs. The literature is inconclusive in part because it has focused predominantly on the environmental pillar alone, or ESG as a combined strategy without clearly delineating how social and governance strategies also affect corporate profitability. Distinguishing between the three pillars of ESG, this paper finds that each of these strategies individually as well as jointly are positively associated with corporate profitability. The findings are robust to firm-level controls for size and access to capital markets, as well as macroeconomic variables, and unobserved country and year fixed effects that may reflect differences in tax jurisdictions and disclosure stringency.","PeriodicalId":234310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Management Sciences","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/jems.v5n2p13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon risks and corporate social responsibility have emerged as top priorities in the global climate change agenda, leading shareholders to exert greater pressure on corporations to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and policymakers to consider regulatory actions on carbon disclosures. Proponents stress that ESG strategies will improve financial performance, while detractors focus on their large upfront costs. The literature is inconclusive in part because it has focused predominantly on the environmental pillar alone, or ESG as a combined strategy without clearly delineating how social and governance strategies also affect corporate profitability. Distinguishing between the three pillars of ESG, this paper finds that each of these strategies individually as well as jointly are positively associated with corporate profitability. The findings are robust to firm-level controls for size and access to capital markets, as well as macroeconomic variables, and unobserved country and year fixed effects that may reflect differences in tax jurisdictions and disclosure stringency.
企业可持续发展的做法和盈利能力-兼容?
碳风险和企业社会责任已成为全球气候变化议程的首要任务,导致股东对企业施加更大的压力,要求其采用环境、社会和治理(ESG)实践,并促使政策制定者考虑对碳披露采取监管行动。支持者强调,ESG战略将改善财务业绩,而批评者则关注其巨大的前期成本。文献不确定的部分原因是,它们主要关注环境支柱,或者将ESG作为一种综合战略,而没有清楚地描述社会和治理战略如何影响公司盈利能力。通过对ESG的三大支柱进行区分,本文发现,无论是单独还是共同,这些战略都与企业盈利能力呈正相关。对于企业规模和资本市场准入的控制、宏观经济变量以及未观察到的国家和年度固定效应(可能反映了税收管辖和信息披露严格程度的差异),研究结果是强有力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信