Wage Theft in Silence: Why Migrant Workers Do Not Recover Their Unpaid Wages in Australia

Bassina Farbenblum, Laurie Berg
{"title":"Wage Theft in Silence: Why Migrant Workers Do Not Recover Their Unpaid Wages in Australia","authors":"Bassina Farbenblum, Laurie Berg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3289002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wage Theft in Silence presents findings from the National Temporary Migrant Work Survey -- the most comprehensive study of working conditions and access to justice among international students, backpackers and other temporary migrants in Australia. It draws on responses from 4,322 temporary migrants across 107 nationalities of every region in the world, working in a range of jobs throughout all Australian states and territories. The report reveals that although the majority of migrant workers were paid well below minimum wage in Australia, the overwhelming majority suffered in silence. Indeed, among international students and backpackers who acknowledged they had been underpaid, only 9% took any action to recover wages they were owed. The report considers the institutions from whom those 9% sought assistance, and whether they were able to recover their wages. These include the Fair Work Ombudsman, education providers and unions.<br><br>The report also presents data on the attitudes and experiences of the 91% of migrant workers who suffered wage theft in silence. Though it is often assumed that most underpaid migrant workers are not interested or willing to take action to get the wages they are owed, in fact well over half of survey participants indicated that they were open to trying to recover their wages. The report presents findings on the range of psychological, practical and other barriers that deterred them from doing so. It concludes that many of these barriers can be addressed through practical measures and policy reform, and it presents a range of recommendations to government, parliament, business and the international education sector to make reporting wage theft possible and rational for migrant workers. These include recommendations for a new or improved process for wage recovery, better resourced support services, and a firewall between the labour regulator and the immigration regulator that guarantees that migrants’ visas will not be jeopardised if they report wage theft.","PeriodicalId":407537,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Empirical Studies of Employment & Labor Law (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Empirical Studies of Employment & Labor Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Wage Theft in Silence presents findings from the National Temporary Migrant Work Survey -- the most comprehensive study of working conditions and access to justice among international students, backpackers and other temporary migrants in Australia. It draws on responses from 4,322 temporary migrants across 107 nationalities of every region in the world, working in a range of jobs throughout all Australian states and territories. The report reveals that although the majority of migrant workers were paid well below minimum wage in Australia, the overwhelming majority suffered in silence. Indeed, among international students and backpackers who acknowledged they had been underpaid, only 9% took any action to recover wages they were owed. The report considers the institutions from whom those 9% sought assistance, and whether they were able to recover their wages. These include the Fair Work Ombudsman, education providers and unions.

The report also presents data on the attitudes and experiences of the 91% of migrant workers who suffered wage theft in silence. Though it is often assumed that most underpaid migrant workers are not interested or willing to take action to get the wages they are owed, in fact well over half of survey participants indicated that they were open to trying to recover their wages. The report presents findings on the range of psychological, practical and other barriers that deterred them from doing so. It concludes that many of these barriers can be addressed through practical measures and policy reform, and it presents a range of recommendations to government, parliament, business and the international education sector to make reporting wage theft possible and rational for migrant workers. These include recommendations for a new or improved process for wage recovery, better resourced support services, and a firewall between the labour regulator and the immigration regulator that guarantees that migrants’ visas will not be jeopardised if they report wage theft.
无声的工资盗窃:为什么澳大利亚的移民工人不拿回他们未付的工资
《沉默的工资盗窃》展示了《全国临时移民工作调查》的调查结果——这是对澳大利亚国际学生、背包客和其他临时移民的工作条件和诉诸司法的最全面研究。该报告收集了来自世界各地107个国家的4322名临时移民的反馈,他们在澳大利亚所有州和地区从事各种工作。报告显示,尽管大多数移民工人的工资远低于澳大利亚的最低工资,但绝大多数人在沉默中受苦。事实上,在承认自己工资过低的国际学生和背包客中,只有9%的人采取了任何行动来追回他们所欠的工资。该报告考虑了这9%的人向哪些机构寻求帮助,以及他们是否能够收回工资。这些机构包括公平工作申诉专员、教育机构和工会。报告还提供了91%默默遭受工资盗窃的农民工的态度和经历的数据。尽管人们通常认为,大多数工资过低的农民工不感兴趣或不愿意采取行动讨回欠他们的工资,但事实上,超过一半的调查参与者表示,他们愿意尝试讨回自己的工资。该报告提出了一系列阻碍他们这样做的心理、实际和其他障碍的调查结果。报告的结论是,许多这些障碍可以通过实际措施和政策改革来解决,并向政府、议会、企业和国际教育部门提出了一系列建议,使报告工资盗窃成为可能和合理的移民工人。这些建议包括:建立一个新的或改进的工资回收流程,提供更充足的支持服务,以及在劳工监管机构和移民监管机构之间建立一道防火墙,以确保移民举报工资盗窃后,他们的签证不会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信