Education and environmental sustainability: culture matters

H. Komatsu, Iveta Silova, Jeremy Rappleye
{"title":"Education and environmental sustainability: culture matters","authors":"H. Komatsu, Iveta Silova, Jeremy Rappleye","doi":"10.1108/jice-04-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeHumans remain unsuccessful in their attempts to achieve environmental sustainability, despite decades of scientific awareness and political efforts toward that end. This paper suggests a fresh conceptualization, one that focuses on education, offers a fuller explanation for our lack of success and calls attention to alternatives.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first critically review mainstream approaches that have been used to achieve environmental sustainability, then introduce an alternative that the authors call the cultural approach. The authors finally discuss how educational research should be re-articulated based on the cultural approach.FindingsThe authors identified three mainstream approaches – the technological, cognitive approach and behaviorist – all of which function to reproduce modern mainstream culture. In contrast, the cultural approach assumes modern mainstream culture as the root cause of environmental unsustainability and aims to rearticulate it. To elaborate a cultural approach, the authors recommend education scholars to (1) bring attention to the role of culture in sustainability and (2) identify education practices that are potentially useful for enacting a cultural shift, primarily developing richer synergies between qualitative and quantitative research.Originality/valueUnlike many previous studies in the field of education, the authors’ account highlights how current mainstream approaches used for current global education policymaking often merely reproduces modern mainstream culture and accelerates the environmental crisis. It thus proposes to redirect educational research for a cultural shift, one that allows human society to move beyond the comforting rhetoric of sustainability and face the survivability imperative.","PeriodicalId":356133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international cooperation in education","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international cooperation in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-04-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeHumans remain unsuccessful in their attempts to achieve environmental sustainability, despite decades of scientific awareness and political efforts toward that end. This paper suggests a fresh conceptualization, one that focuses on education, offers a fuller explanation for our lack of success and calls attention to alternatives.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first critically review mainstream approaches that have been used to achieve environmental sustainability, then introduce an alternative that the authors call the cultural approach. The authors finally discuss how educational research should be re-articulated based on the cultural approach.FindingsThe authors identified three mainstream approaches – the technological, cognitive approach and behaviorist – all of which function to reproduce modern mainstream culture. In contrast, the cultural approach assumes modern mainstream culture as the root cause of environmental unsustainability and aims to rearticulate it. To elaborate a cultural approach, the authors recommend education scholars to (1) bring attention to the role of culture in sustainability and (2) identify education practices that are potentially useful for enacting a cultural shift, primarily developing richer synergies between qualitative and quantitative research.Originality/valueUnlike many previous studies in the field of education, the authors’ account highlights how current mainstream approaches used for current global education policymaking often merely reproduces modern mainstream culture and accelerates the environmental crisis. It thus proposes to redirect educational research for a cultural shift, one that allows human society to move beyond the comforting rhetoric of sustainability and face the survivability imperative.
教育和环境可持续性:文化至关重要
人类在实现环境可持续性方面的尝试仍然不成功,尽管几十年来科学意识和政治努力都在朝着这一目标努力。这篇论文提出了一个新的概念,一个关注教育的概念,为我们缺乏成功提供了一个更全面的解释,并呼吁人们关注其他选择。设计/方法论/方法作者首先批判性地回顾了用于实现环境可持续性的主流方法,然后介绍了一种替代方法,作者称之为文化方法。最后,作者讨论了如何在文化方法的基础上重新阐述教育研究。研究结果作者确定了三种主流方法——技术方法、认知方法和行为主义方法——它们都具有再现现代主流文化的功能。相反,文化方法认为现代主流文化是环境不可持续性的根本原因,并旨在重新阐明它。为了阐述一种文化方法,作者建议教育学者:(1)关注文化在可持续性中的作用;(2)确定可能有助于实现文化转变的教育实践,主要是在定性和定量研究之间发展更丰富的协同作用。原创性/价值与之前许多教育领域的研究不同,作者的叙述强调了当前用于当前全球教育政策制定的主流方法往往只是复制现代主流文化,并加速了环境危机。因此,它建议重新定向教育研究,以实现文化转变,使人类社会能够超越可持续性的安慰修辞,并面对生存能力的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信