Implementing the Transition Mandate

D. Test
{"title":"Implementing the Transition Mandate","authors":"D. Test","doi":"10.1300/J008v16n01_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For more than a decade, professional literature has been available demonstrating which transition services lead to successful student outcomes. However, only a few studies have investigated how to effectively deliver these recommended services. The North Carolina Transition Services Survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the federally-funded transition systems change grant. Data regarding the current status of providing transition services to all youth with disabilities was gathered via a questionnaire completed by 76 of 119 (63.8%) school systems. A post-hoc analysis of these data was conducted to evaluate the relationship between different types of transition services implementation strategies (i.e., a coordinated program, presence of Transition Coordinator, and/or Transition Teacher) and the delivery of best practice services (i.e., transition planning, interagency collaboration, community-based training, trial worksites, inservice, and post-school data collection). Results indicated that public school systems which focused on implementing a coordinated transition program, rather than hiring transition personnel, tended to provide a more complete array of “best practice” transition services.","PeriodicalId":287957,"journal":{"name":"Special services in the schools","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special services in the schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v16n01_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract For more than a decade, professional literature has been available demonstrating which transition services lead to successful student outcomes. However, only a few studies have investigated how to effectively deliver these recommended services. The North Carolina Transition Services Survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the federally-funded transition systems change grant. Data regarding the current status of providing transition services to all youth with disabilities was gathered via a questionnaire completed by 76 of 119 (63.8%) school systems. A post-hoc analysis of these data was conducted to evaluate the relationship between different types of transition services implementation strategies (i.e., a coordinated program, presence of Transition Coordinator, and/or Transition Teacher) and the delivery of best practice services (i.e., transition planning, interagency collaboration, community-based training, trial worksites, inservice, and post-school data collection). Results indicated that public school systems which focused on implementing a coordinated transition program, rather than hiring transition personnel, tended to provide a more complete array of “best practice” transition services.
执行过渡任务
十多年来,专业文献已经证明了哪些过渡服务可以导致成功的学生成果。然而,只有少数研究调查了如何有效地提供这些推荐的服务。北卡罗莱纳过渡服务调查旨在评估联邦资助的过渡系统变更补助金的影响。119个学校系统中的76个(63.8%)通过问卷调查收集了有关向所有残疾青年提供过渡服务的现状的数据。对这些数据进行了事后分析,以评估不同类型的过渡服务实施策略(即协调项目、过渡协调员和/或过渡教师的存在)与最佳实践服务(即过渡规划、机构间合作、社区培训、试验工作场所、在职和毕业后数据收集)之间的关系。结果表明,侧重于实施协调过渡方案而不是雇用过渡人员的公立学校系统倾向于提供更完整的“最佳实践”过渡服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信