K. Buchin, Mart Hagedoorn, I. Kostitsyna, Max van Mulken
{"title":"Dots & Boxes is PSPACE-complete","authors":"K. Buchin, Mart Hagedoorn, I. Kostitsyna, Max van Mulken","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exactly 20 years ago at MFCS, Demaine posed the open problem whether the game of Dots&Boxes is PSPACE-complete. Dots&Boxes has been studied extensively, with for instance a chapter in Berlekamp et al.\"Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays\", a whole book on the game\"The Dots and Boxes Game: Sophisticated Child's Play\"by Berlekamp, and numerous articles in the\"Games of No Chance\"series. While known to be NP-hard, the question of its complexity remained open. We resolve this question, proving that the game is PSPACE-complete by a reduction from a game played on propositional formulas.","PeriodicalId":369104,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Exactly 20 years ago at MFCS, Demaine posed the open problem whether the game of Dots&Boxes is PSPACE-complete. Dots&Boxes has been studied extensively, with for instance a chapter in Berlekamp et al."Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays", a whole book on the game"The Dots and Boxes Game: Sophisticated Child's Play"by Berlekamp, and numerous articles in the"Games of No Chance"series. While known to be NP-hard, the question of its complexity remained open. We resolve this question, proving that the game is PSPACE-complete by a reduction from a game played on propositional formulas.