Perceptions of Crime and Subjective Well-Being: Urban-Rural Differences in South Africa

B. Fisher, Frederich Kirsten, M. Biyase, M. Pretorius
{"title":"Perceptions of Crime and Subjective Well-Being: Urban-Rural Differences in South Africa","authors":"B. Fisher, Frederich Kirsten, M. Biyase, M. Pretorius","doi":"10.1353/jda.2022.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Reducing crime is a fundamental goal of all policymakers, because its costs are both pecuniary and non-pecuniary. A number of studies have shown that individuals who are victims of crime report lower levels of life satisfaction or subjective well-being (SWB) as compared to non-victims (Powdthavee, 2005; Cohen, 2008; Davies & Hinks, 2010). But, what is not as clear is how this nexus may differ based on household geo-type, or put differently, whether a household is located in an urban area versus a rural area. The rationale as to why geographical location is likely to play a role is as follows: (a) people migrate from rural to urban areas in hopes of finding a job or better standard of living. Given that urban migration is associated with \"false expectations\" (Mulcahy & Kollamparambil, 2016:1357), it may lead some to turn to crime as a means of coping. Therefore, one expects to see more crime in cities as opposed to farm areas. (b) In rural areas, people share a sense of community or 'Ubuntu'. This means that should someone fall victim to crime, others will ensure that its effects on well-being are minimized, by assisting where they can. (c) Social disorganization theory explains differences in urban and rural crime rates, as it suggests that \"a person's residential location is more significant than the person's characteristics when predicting criminal activity\" (Bond, 2015: para 4). This paper investigates the impact of perceived crime on individual well-being in urban and rural areas of South Africa using a nationally representative panel dataset from 2008 to 2017. By making use of a fixed-effect model, a finding was that perceived crime negatively influences the SWB of individuals living in rural and urban areas in South Africa. Unlike the urban coefficient, the rural coefficient is not statistically significant. These results suggest two patterns: firstly, perceived crime plays a stronger role in predicting SWB in urban areas as compared to rural areas. This is likely because urbanization is linked to a higher rate of crime (Park, Burgess & McKenzie, 1925). Secondly, it provides empirical support that there exists a geographically differentiated relationship between perceived crime and the SWB nexus in South Africa. The estimates are robust to the inclusion of the inequality variable as well as alternative models (specifically random ordered probit model).","PeriodicalId":286315,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Developing Areas","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Reducing crime is a fundamental goal of all policymakers, because its costs are both pecuniary and non-pecuniary. A number of studies have shown that individuals who are victims of crime report lower levels of life satisfaction or subjective well-being (SWB) as compared to non-victims (Powdthavee, 2005; Cohen, 2008; Davies & Hinks, 2010). But, what is not as clear is how this nexus may differ based on household geo-type, or put differently, whether a household is located in an urban area versus a rural area. The rationale as to why geographical location is likely to play a role is as follows: (a) people migrate from rural to urban areas in hopes of finding a job or better standard of living. Given that urban migration is associated with "false expectations" (Mulcahy & Kollamparambil, 2016:1357), it may lead some to turn to crime as a means of coping. Therefore, one expects to see more crime in cities as opposed to farm areas. (b) In rural areas, people share a sense of community or 'Ubuntu'. This means that should someone fall victim to crime, others will ensure that its effects on well-being are minimized, by assisting where they can. (c) Social disorganization theory explains differences in urban and rural crime rates, as it suggests that "a person's residential location is more significant than the person's characteristics when predicting criminal activity" (Bond, 2015: para 4). This paper investigates the impact of perceived crime on individual well-being in urban and rural areas of South Africa using a nationally representative panel dataset from 2008 to 2017. By making use of a fixed-effect model, a finding was that perceived crime negatively influences the SWB of individuals living in rural and urban areas in South Africa. Unlike the urban coefficient, the rural coefficient is not statistically significant. These results suggest two patterns: firstly, perceived crime plays a stronger role in predicting SWB in urban areas as compared to rural areas. This is likely because urbanization is linked to a higher rate of crime (Park, Burgess & McKenzie, 1925). Secondly, it provides empirical support that there exists a geographically differentiated relationship between perceived crime and the SWB nexus in South Africa. The estimates are robust to the inclusion of the inequality variable as well as alternative models (specifically random ordered probit model).
犯罪认知与主观幸福感:南非的城乡差异
摘要:减少犯罪是所有政策制定者的基本目标,因为其成本既有金钱成本,也有非金钱成本。许多研究表明,与非受害者相比,犯罪受害者的生活满意度或主观幸福感(SWB)水平较低(Powdthavee, 2005;科恩,2008;Davies & Hinks, 2010)。但是,尚不清楚的是,这种联系如何根据家庭地理类型而有所不同,或者换句话说,无论家庭位于城市地区还是农村地区。地理位置可能起作用的理由如下:(a)人们从农村迁移到城市地区,希望找到一份工作或提高生活水平。鉴于城市移民与“错误期望”有关(Mulcahy & Kollamparambil, 2016:1357),这可能导致一些人转向犯罪作为应对手段。因此,与农村地区相比,人们预计城市犯罪会更多。(b)在农村地区,人们有一种社区意识或“乌班图”。这意味着,如果有人成为犯罪的受害者,其他人将尽其所能提供帮助,确保将犯罪对福祉的影响降到最低。(c)社会组织失调理论解释了城市和农村犯罪率的差异,因为它表明“在预测犯罪活动时,一个人的居住地点比他的特征更重要”(Bond, 2015:第4段)。本文使用2008年至2017年的全国代表性面板数据集调查了感知犯罪对南非城乡地区个人福祉的影响。通过使用固定效应模型,发现感知犯罪对生活在南非农村和城市地区的个人的幸福感产生了负面影响。与城市系数不同,农村系数在统计上不显著。这些结果表明了两种模式:第一,与农村地区相比,城市地区的感知犯罪对主观幸福感的预测作用更强。这可能是因为城市化与较高的犯罪率有关(Park, Burgess & McKenzie, 1925)。其次,本文为南非感知犯罪与SWB联系之间存在地理差异关系提供了实证支持。估计是稳健的不平等变量的包含以及替代模型(特别是随机有序probit模型)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信