Concepts in K-9 Computer Science Education

E. Barendsen, Linda Mannila, B. Demo, Nataša Grgurina, C. Izu, C. Mirolo, Sue Sentance, Amber Settle, G. Stupurienė
{"title":"Concepts in K-9 Computer Science Education","authors":"E. Barendsen, Linda Mannila, B. Demo, Nataša Grgurina, C. Izu, C. Mirolo, Sue Sentance, Amber Settle, G. Stupurienė","doi":"10.1145/2858796.2858800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study focuses on concepts and their assessment in K-9 computer science (CS) education. We analyzed concepts in local curriculum documents and guidelines, as well as interviewed K-9 teachers in two countries about their teaching and assessment practices. Moreover, we investigated the 'task based assessment' approach of the international Bebras contest by classifying the conceptual content and question structure of Bebras tasks spanning five years. Our results show a variety in breadth and focus in curriculum documents, with the notion of algorithm as a significant common concept. Teachers' practice appears to vary, depending on their respective backgrounds. Informal assessment practices are predominant, especially in the case of younger students. In the Bebras tasks, algorithms and data representation were found to be the main concept categories. The question structure follows specific patterns, but the relative frequencies of the patterns employed in the tasks vary over the years. Our analysis methods appear to be interesting in themselves, and the results of our study give rise to suggestions for follow-up research.","PeriodicalId":141200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

This exploratory study focuses on concepts and their assessment in K-9 computer science (CS) education. We analyzed concepts in local curriculum documents and guidelines, as well as interviewed K-9 teachers in two countries about their teaching and assessment practices. Moreover, we investigated the 'task based assessment' approach of the international Bebras contest by classifying the conceptual content and question structure of Bebras tasks spanning five years. Our results show a variety in breadth and focus in curriculum documents, with the notion of algorithm as a significant common concept. Teachers' practice appears to vary, depending on their respective backgrounds. Informal assessment practices are predominant, especially in the case of younger students. In the Bebras tasks, algorithms and data representation were found to be the main concept categories. The question structure follows specific patterns, but the relative frequencies of the patterns employed in the tasks vary over the years. Our analysis methods appear to be interesting in themselves, and the results of our study give rise to suggestions for follow-up research.
K-9计算机科学教育中的概念
本研究主要针对K-9计算机科学(CS)教育中的概念及其评估进行探讨。我们分析了当地课程文件和指南中的概念,并采访了两个国家的K-9教师,了解他们的教学和评估实践。此外,我们通过对跨越五年的Bebras任务的概念内容和问题结构进行分类,研究了国际Bebras竞赛的“基于任务的评估”方法。我们的研究结果显示,课程文件的广度和重点各不相同,算法的概念是一个重要的共同概念。教师的实践似乎各不相同,取决于他们各自的背景。非正式的评估实践占主导地位,特别是在年轻学生的情况下。在Bebras的任务中,算法和数据表示是主要的概念类别。问题结构遵循特定的模式,但任务中使用的模式的相对频率随着时间的推移而变化。我们的分析方法本身就很有趣,我们的研究结果也为后续的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信