Efficacy of Manual Therapy for Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jeong-hoon Ahn, Chang-woo Seon, Byung-jun Kim, I. Park, Yoon-yup Cha
{"title":"Efficacy of Manual Therapy for Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Jeong-hoon Ahn, Chang-woo Seon, Byung-jun Kim, I. Park, Yoon-yup Cha","doi":"10.30581/jcmm.2023.18.1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : This review was conducted to investigate the evidence of efficacy of manual therapy for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). \nMethods : We searched 10 electronic databases (CAJ [CNKI], CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, DBpia, KISS, RISS, and OASIS) to find randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating manual therapy for FMS. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and score in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) were analyzed as the main evaluation criteria. \nResults : Among 273 articles, 254 were screened and 19 RCTs were selected. Only 17 RCTs could be statistically analyzed. Manual therapy was more effective than placebo or sham or no treatment in terms of VAS (p=0.0003). When combined with medication or exercises, manual therapy showed therapeutic effect in terms of reducing pain (VAS) and ameliorating symptoms of FMS (FIQ). However, manual therapy did not show its effect in terms of VAS compared to medication. Lastly, there were no significant difference between manual therapy and exercise in terms of improvements in VAS and FIQ. \nConclusions : Effectiveness of manual therapy including CMT for treating FMS was identified. However, this study has its limitations due to the small size and number of RCTs that were included in this study. Nevertheless this study could be a groundwork for well-designed research for CMT for FMS.","PeriodicalId":430318,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30581/jcmm.2023.18.1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives : This review was conducted to investigate the evidence of efficacy of manual therapy for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Methods : We searched 10 electronic databases (CAJ [CNKI], CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, DBpia, KISS, RISS, and OASIS) to find randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating manual therapy for FMS. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and score in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) were analyzed as the main evaluation criteria. Results : Among 273 articles, 254 were screened and 19 RCTs were selected. Only 17 RCTs could be statistically analyzed. Manual therapy was more effective than placebo or sham or no treatment in terms of VAS (p=0.0003). When combined with medication or exercises, manual therapy showed therapeutic effect in terms of reducing pain (VAS) and ameliorating symptoms of FMS (FIQ). However, manual therapy did not show its effect in terms of VAS compared to medication. Lastly, there were no significant difference between manual therapy and exercise in terms of improvements in VAS and FIQ. Conclusions : Effectiveness of manual therapy including CMT for treating FMS was identified. However, this study has its limitations due to the small size and number of RCTs that were included in this study. Nevertheless this study could be a groundwork for well-designed research for CMT for FMS.
手工疗法治疗纤维肌痛综合征的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本综述旨在探讨手工疗法治疗纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的疗效证据。方法:我们检索了10个电子数据库(CAJ [CNKI]、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、DBpia、KISS、RISS和OASIS),找到了研究手工治疗FMS的随机对照临床试验(RCTs)。以视觉模拟量表(VAS)和纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)评分作为主要评价标准。结果:273篇文献中筛选254篇,入选19项rct。只有17个rct可以进行统计分析。在VAS方面,手工治疗比安慰剂、假治疗或不治疗更有效(p=0.0003)。当与药物或运动相结合时,手工治疗在减轻疼痛(VAS)和改善FMS症状(FIQ)方面显示出治疗效果。然而,与药物治疗相比,手工治疗在VAS方面没有显示出其效果。最后,在VAS和FIQ的改善方面,手工治疗和运动治疗没有显著差异。结论:确定了包括CMT在内的手工疗法治疗FMS的有效性。然而,由于本研究纳入的随机对照试验的规模和数量较小,本研究存在局限性。尽管如此,本研究可以为FMS的CMT设计奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信