Effectiveness of Combination Irrigant Technique for Debris Removal in Simulated Canal Irregularities: An in vitro Study

S. Dhivyalakshmi, N. Velmurugan, G. Lakshmanan, L. Karthik
{"title":"Effectiveness of Combination Irrigant Technique for Debris Removal in Simulated Canal Irregularities: An in vitro Study","authors":"S. Dhivyalakshmi, N. Velmurugan, G. Lakshmanan, L. Karthik","doi":"10.31254/dentistry.2019.4208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the debridement efficacy of different irrigation systems in simulated canal irregularities. Study Design and Setting: About sixty maxillary central incisors were selected and after chemomechanical preparation were split longitudinally into two halves. Each groove and depression were filled with dentine debris mixed with 2.5 % NaOCl to simulate a situation where dentine debris accumulates in the un-instrumented extensions of the root canal. Materials and Methods: The specimens were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups as follows: Group I - Conventional Needle Irrigation, Group II - Apical Negative Pressure Irrigation (EndoVac), Group III - Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Group IV - Combination Irrigation (EV+PUI). 9 ml of 2.5 % NaOCl, 9 ml of 17 % EDTA and 9 ml of saline was used for the final irrigation protocol. Images were taken before and after irrigation using PRIMA DNT surgical microscope with digital camera. Statistical Analysis: The intergroup and individual comparison of percentage reduction of debris in groove and depressions were carried out by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests respectively. The intergroup comparison for different scoring criteria was compared using Pearson’s chi-square tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at P value < 0.05. Results: The combination group, EV group and PUI group showed better removal of debris in Groove and Depressions than Conventional needle irrigation group. The Combination group had significant reduction of debris at 2 mm level when compared to all the other groups. Conclusion: The effectiveness of this combination irrigant delivery system for smear layer removal and antibacterial efficacy have to be evaluated further in future clinical studies","PeriodicalId":240291,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry Research","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31254/dentistry.2019.4208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the debridement efficacy of different irrigation systems in simulated canal irregularities. Study Design and Setting: About sixty maxillary central incisors were selected and after chemomechanical preparation were split longitudinally into two halves. Each groove and depression were filled with dentine debris mixed with 2.5 % NaOCl to simulate a situation where dentine debris accumulates in the un-instrumented extensions of the root canal. Materials and Methods: The specimens were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups as follows: Group I - Conventional Needle Irrigation, Group II - Apical Negative Pressure Irrigation (EndoVac), Group III - Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Group IV - Combination Irrigation (EV+PUI). 9 ml of 2.5 % NaOCl, 9 ml of 17 % EDTA and 9 ml of saline was used for the final irrigation protocol. Images were taken before and after irrigation using PRIMA DNT surgical microscope with digital camera. Statistical Analysis: The intergroup and individual comparison of percentage reduction of debris in groove and depressions were carried out by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests respectively. The intergroup comparison for different scoring criteria was compared using Pearson’s chi-square tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at P value < 0.05. Results: The combination group, EV group and PUI group showed better removal of debris in Groove and Depressions than Conventional needle irrigation group. The Combination group had significant reduction of debris at 2 mm level when compared to all the other groups. Conclusion: The effectiveness of this combination irrigant delivery system for smear layer removal and antibacterial efficacy have to be evaluated further in future clinical studies
联合灌溉技术去除模拟管状不规则碎片的有效性:体外研究
目的:评价不同灌洗系统对模拟肛管畸形的清创术效果。研究设计与设置:选择约60个上颌中切牙,经化学力学准备后纵向分成两半。每个槽和凹处填充混合了2.5% NaOCl的牙本质碎片,以模拟牙本质碎片在无器械根管延伸处堆积的情况。材料与方法:将标本随机分为4个实验组:I组常规针刺冲洗、II组根尖负压冲洗(EndoVac)、III组被动超声冲洗和IV组联合冲洗(EV+PUI)。9ml 2.5% NaOCl, 9ml 17% EDTA和9ml生理盐水用于最后的冲洗方案。采用数码相机PRIMA DNT手术显微镜拍摄冲洗前后图像。统计分析:分别采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间和个体间沟槽和洼地碎屑减少百分比的比较。采用Pearson卡方检验比较不同评分标准的组间比较。P值< 0.05认为差异有统计学意义。结果:联合组、EV组和PUI组对沟槽和洼地碎屑的清除效果优于常规针洗组。与所有其他组相比,联合组在2毫米水平上明显减少了碎片。结论:该联合灌洗系统对口腔粘膜涂片层的去除效果及抗菌效果有待于进一步的临床研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信