Tian Ye, S. Kuppannagari, C. Rose, Sasindu Wijeratne, R. Kannan, V. Prasanna
{"title":"Estimating the Impact of Communication Schemes for Distributed Graph Processing","authors":"Tian Ye, S. Kuppannagari, C. Rose, Sasindu Wijeratne, R. Kannan, V. Prasanna","doi":"10.1109/ISPDC55340.2022.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme scale graph analytics is imperative for several real-world Big Data applications with the underlying graph structure containing millions or billions of vertices and edges. Since such huge graphs cannot fit into the memory of a single computer, distributed processing of the graph is required. Several frameworks have been developed for performing graph processing on distributed systems. The frameworks focus primarily on choosing the right computation model and the partitioning scheme under the assumption that such design choices will automatically reduce the communication overheads. For any computational model and partitioning scheme, communication schemes — the data to be communicated and the virtual interconnection network among the nodes — have significant impact on the performance. To analyze this impact, in this work, we identify widely used communication schemes and estimate their performance. Analyzing the trade-offs between the number of compute nodes and communication costs of various schemes on a distributed platform by brute force experimentation can be prohibitively expensive. Thus, our performance estimation models provide an economic way to perform the analyses given the partitions and the communication scheme as input. We validate our model on a local HPC cluster as well as the cloud hosted NSF Chameleon cluster. Using our estimates as well as the actual measurements, we compare the communication schemes and provide conditions under which one scheme should be preferred over the others.","PeriodicalId":389334,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPDC55340.2022.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extreme scale graph analytics is imperative for several real-world Big Data applications with the underlying graph structure containing millions or billions of vertices and edges. Since such huge graphs cannot fit into the memory of a single computer, distributed processing of the graph is required. Several frameworks have been developed for performing graph processing on distributed systems. The frameworks focus primarily on choosing the right computation model and the partitioning scheme under the assumption that such design choices will automatically reduce the communication overheads. For any computational model and partitioning scheme, communication schemes — the data to be communicated and the virtual interconnection network among the nodes — have significant impact on the performance. To analyze this impact, in this work, we identify widely used communication schemes and estimate their performance. Analyzing the trade-offs between the number of compute nodes and communication costs of various schemes on a distributed platform by brute force experimentation can be prohibitively expensive. Thus, our performance estimation models provide an economic way to perform the analyses given the partitions and the communication scheme as input. We validate our model on a local HPC cluster as well as the cloud hosted NSF Chameleon cluster. Using our estimates as well as the actual measurements, we compare the communication schemes and provide conditions under which one scheme should be preferred over the others.