Evaluating a Language Workbench: from Working Memory Capacity to Comprehension to Acceptance

Giovanna Broccia, Alessio Ferrari, M. T. Beek, W. Cazzola, L. Favalli, Francesco Bertolotti
{"title":"Evaluating a Language Workbench: from Working Memory Capacity to Comprehension to Acceptance","authors":"Giovanna Broccia, Alessio Ferrari, M. T. Beek, W. Cazzola, L. Favalli, Francesco Bertolotti","doi":"10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language workbenches are tools that enable the definition, reuse and composition of programming languages and their ecosystem. This breed of frameworks aims to make the development of new languages easier and more affordable. Consequently, the comprehensibility of the language used in a language workbench (i.e., the meta-language) should be an important aspect to consider and evaluate. To the best of our knowledge, although the quantitative aspects of language workbenches are often discussed in the literature, the evaluation of comprehensibility is typically neglected.Neverlang is a language workbench that enables the definition of languages with a modular approach. This paper presents a preliminary study that intends to assess the comprehensibility of Neverlang programs, evaluated in terms of users’ effectiveness and efficiency in a code comprehension task. The study also investigates the relationship between Neverlang comprehensibility and the users’ working memory capacity. Furthermore, we intend to capture the relationship between Neverlang comprehensibility and users’ acceptance, in terms of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to use. Our preliminary results on 10 subjects suggest that the users’ working memory capacity may be related to the ability to comprehend Neverlang programs. On the other hand, effectiveness and efficiency do not appear to be associated with an increase in users’ acceptance variables.","PeriodicalId":376593,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language workbenches are tools that enable the definition, reuse and composition of programming languages and their ecosystem. This breed of frameworks aims to make the development of new languages easier and more affordable. Consequently, the comprehensibility of the language used in a language workbench (i.e., the meta-language) should be an important aspect to consider and evaluate. To the best of our knowledge, although the quantitative aspects of language workbenches are often discussed in the literature, the evaluation of comprehensibility is typically neglected.Neverlang is a language workbench that enables the definition of languages with a modular approach. This paper presents a preliminary study that intends to assess the comprehensibility of Neverlang programs, evaluated in terms of users’ effectiveness and efficiency in a code comprehension task. The study also investigates the relationship between Neverlang comprehensibility and the users’ working memory capacity. Furthermore, we intend to capture the relationship between Neverlang comprehensibility and users’ acceptance, in terms of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to use. Our preliminary results on 10 subjects suggest that the users’ working memory capacity may be related to the ability to comprehend Neverlang programs. On the other hand, effectiveness and efficiency do not appear to be associated with an increase in users’ acceptance variables.
评估语言工作台:从工作记忆容量到理解再到接受
语言工作台是能够定义、重用和组合编程语言及其生态系统的工具。这类框架旨在使新语言的开发更容易、更实惠。因此,语言工作台(即元语言)中使用的语言的可理解性应该是需要考虑和评估的一个重要方面。据我们所知,虽然语言工作台的定量方面经常在文献中讨论,但可理解性的评估通常被忽视。Neverlang是一个语言工作台,它支持用模块化的方法定义语言。本文提出了一项初步研究,旨在评估Neverlang程序的可理解性,根据用户在代码理解任务中的有效性和效率进行评估。本研究还探讨了Neverlang可理解性与使用者工作记忆容量之间的关系。此外,我们打算抓住Neverlang的可理解性和用户接受度之间的关系,即感知易用性、感知有用性和使用意图。我们对10个被试的初步结果表明,使用者的工作记忆容量可能与理解Neverlang程序的能力有关。另一方面,有效性和效率似乎与用户接受变量的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信