SARS-CoV-2 and Cystic Fibrosis: Expectations Versus Reality, a Literature Review

M. Bantounou, Josip Plascevic
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 and Cystic Fibrosis: Expectations Versus Reality, a Literature Review","authors":"M. Bantounou, Josip Plascevic","doi":"10.33590/emjrespir/20-00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, is expected to cause severe illness in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). The infection prevalence and clinical outcomes of this patient cohort to SARS-CoV-2 were explored, alongside contributing factors to the observed response. \nSearch terms were entered into Medline/PubMed and Embase databases, with relevant published papers written in English chosen. \nThe COVID-19 trajectory in people with CF (including children) was similar to the general population. Specifically, in Veneto, Italy, the infection rate of people with CF was nearly half compared to the general population (0.19% versus 0.40%, respectively). Similarly, in Spain, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower compared to the general population: 32/10,000 and 49/10,000 respectively. Likewise, in Belgium 2.7% of patients with CF had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies compared with 4.3% of the general population. Moreover, in Europe, fewer CF–COVID-19 cases and deaths were reported compared to the general population (1.1%, 0.9%; and 3.2%, 2.3%, respectively). Overall, worse outcomes in CF were associated with poorer lung function and post-transplant status. \nThe encouraging response of people with CF to COVID-19 is hypothesised as due to higher levels of anti-inflammatory angiotensin-1-7 and lower levels of pro-inflammatory IL-6 and protease transmembrane serine protease-2, utilised by SARS-CoV-2 to penetrate cells. Additionally, the use of CF medication, chiefly Dornase alfa and CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators as well as CF cohort characteristics, predominantly younger age, and early isolation might have mitigated COVID-19 severity. \nThus, people with CF do not appear to have a higher COVID-19 infection prevalence or worse clinical outcomes compared to the general population.","PeriodicalId":300382,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Respiratory","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Respiratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjrespir/20-00275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, is expected to cause severe illness in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). The infection prevalence and clinical outcomes of this patient cohort to SARS-CoV-2 were explored, alongside contributing factors to the observed response. Search terms were entered into Medline/PubMed and Embase databases, with relevant published papers written in English chosen. The COVID-19 trajectory in people with CF (including children) was similar to the general population. Specifically, in Veneto, Italy, the infection rate of people with CF was nearly half compared to the general population (0.19% versus 0.40%, respectively). Similarly, in Spain, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower compared to the general population: 32/10,000 and 49/10,000 respectively. Likewise, in Belgium 2.7% of patients with CF had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies compared with 4.3% of the general population. Moreover, in Europe, fewer CF–COVID-19 cases and deaths were reported compared to the general population (1.1%, 0.9%; and 3.2%, 2.3%, respectively). Overall, worse outcomes in CF were associated with poorer lung function and post-transplant status. The encouraging response of people with CF to COVID-19 is hypothesised as due to higher levels of anti-inflammatory angiotensin-1-7 and lower levels of pro-inflammatory IL-6 and protease transmembrane serine protease-2, utilised by SARS-CoV-2 to penetrate cells. Additionally, the use of CF medication, chiefly Dornase alfa and CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators as well as CF cohort characteristics, predominantly younger age, and early isolation might have mitigated COVID-19 severity. Thus, people with CF do not appear to have a higher COVID-19 infection prevalence or worse clinical outcomes compared to the general population.
SARS-CoV-2与囊性纤维化:期望与现实,文献综述
导致COVID-19大流行的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)预计会导致囊性纤维化(CF)患者出现严重疾病。探讨了该患者队列的SARS-CoV-2感染流行率和临床结果,以及观察到的反应的影响因素。将检索词输入Medline/PubMed和Embase数据库,选择相关已发表的英文论文。CF患者(包括儿童)的COVID-19轨迹与一般人群相似。具体而言,在意大利威尼托,CF患者的感染率几乎是普通人群的一半(分别为0.19%和0.40%)。同样,在西班牙,与普通人群相比,COVID-19的累积发病率较低,分别为32/10,000和49/10,000。同样,在比利时,2.7%的CF患者有SARS-CoV-2抗体,而普通人群的这一比例为4.3%。此外,在欧洲,与一般人群相比,报告的covid -19病例和死亡人数较少(1.1%,0.9%;3.2%, 2.3%)。总体而言,CF患者较差的预后与较差的肺功能和移植后状态相关。假设CF患者对COVID-19的令人鼓舞的反应是由于抗炎血管紧张素-1-7水平较高,促炎IL-6水平较低,蛋白酶跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶-2水平较低,SARS-CoV-2利用该蛋白酶穿透细胞。此外,CF药物(主要是Dornase alfa和CF跨膜电导调节剂)的使用以及CF队列特征(主要是年轻)和早期隔离可能减轻了COVID-19的严重程度。因此,与一般人群相比,CF患者似乎没有更高的COVID-19感染率或更差的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信