A Theoretical Study of Comparison of Graphene, Superconductors and Metals as Conductors for Meta Materials and Plasmonics

S. Paul, S. Srivastava, L. K. Mishra
{"title":"A Theoretical Study of Comparison of Graphene, Superconductors and Metals as Conductors for\nMeta Materials and Plasmonics","authors":"S. Paul, S. Srivastava, L. K. Mishra","doi":"10.29055/jpaip/320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the theoretical formalism of P Tassin et al. [Nature Photonics, 6, 259 (2012)] and C M Soukoulis et al. [Science 330, 1633 (2010)], we have theoretically studied the comparison of grapheme, superconductors and metals as conductors for meta-materials and plasmonics. We observed the following facts: We observed from the analysis of figureof merit that grapheme and highTC superconductors are not viable alternatives for metals in meta-materials. For Plasmonic systems, our analysis indicate that grapheme and high TCsuperconductors cannot outperform gold as a platform for surface Plasmon polaritons, because grapheme has a smaller propagation length-to wavelength ratio. Since the recent advancement in meta-materials and plasmonics have promised a number of exciting applications particularly at terahertz and optical frequencies this work will be quite useful in this regards. As noble metals used in these photonic structures are not good conductors at high frequencies resulting in significant dissipative loss, these findings will be helpful.","PeriodicalId":101818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29055/jpaip/320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the theoretical formalism of P Tassin et al. [Nature Photonics, 6, 259 (2012)] and C M Soukoulis et al. [Science 330, 1633 (2010)], we have theoretically studied the comparison of grapheme, superconductors and metals as conductors for meta-materials and plasmonics. We observed the following facts: We observed from the analysis of figureof merit that grapheme and highTC superconductors are not viable alternatives for metals in meta-materials. For Plasmonic systems, our analysis indicate that grapheme and high TCsuperconductors cannot outperform gold as a platform for surface Plasmon polaritons, because grapheme has a smaller propagation length-to wavelength ratio. Since the recent advancement in meta-materials and plasmonics have promised a number of exciting applications particularly at terahertz and optical frequencies this work will be quite useful in this regards. As noble metals used in these photonic structures are not good conductors at high frequencies resulting in significant dissipative loss, these findings will be helpful.
石墨烯、超导体和金属作为元材料和等离子体导体比较的理论研究
利用P Tassin etal . [Nature Photonics, 6,259(2012)]和C M Soukoulis etal . [Science 330, 1633(2010)]的理论形式,我们从理论上研究了石墨烯、超导体和金属作为超材料和等离子体导体的比较。我们观察到以下事实:我们从性能图分析中观察到石墨烯和高tc超导体不是金属在超材料中的可行替代品。对于等离子体系统,我们的分析表明石墨烯和高tc超导体作为表面等离子体激元的平台的性能不能超过金,因为石墨烯具有较小的传播长波比。由于最近在超材料和等离子体动力学方面的进展已经承诺了许多令人兴奋的应用,特别是在太赫兹和光学频率方面,这项工作将在这方面非常有用。由于用于这些光子结构的贵金属在高频下不是良导体,导致显著的耗散损耗,因此这些发现将有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信